In article <j4kkq35kb496ad7f87a7d5tlu67b2g987n@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, DavidMorgan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:50:43 GMT, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"
> <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Disneygeek" <edrhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message...
> >
> >> Also, she
> >> mentions at several points that the area has been completely closed
> >> off,
> >
> >Of course the area was closed off... no one could be allowed to see and
> >photograph the cut steel beams that were piled up on the ground. The
few
> >pictures that have gotten out have proven to be devastating for the
pundits
> >of the government story.
>
> You're such an idiot, skypileit. There were no "cut steel beams that
> were piled up on the ground" from WTC7. If there were, I'm sure you
> would provide a citation to the photographs. But, of course, you
> won't.
>
> >> so she's obviously working from sketchy informaion at best.
> >
> >Of course she was working from 'sketchy' information... the building
likely
> >was supposed to have come down earlier and the word had already been
> >passed among a few selects and spoon-fed to the remainder... and since
> >it hadn't been hit by a plane
>
> But it was hit by large pieces of steel from the collapse of WTC1.
> Just like the Verizon building that was next door to it.
>
> > and no steel building had *EVER* fallen from
> >fires, of course there was "confusion" on the part of anyone with a
brain.
>
> Lots of steel buildings have collapsed due to fire. Or do you think
> that the fire retardent insulation that is required to be put on the
> steel is just for show?
>
Ahh, the mind of Sky Pile-It...does it even exist?
When I think of him, I think of a Hamster doing it's thing on the wheel.
Compulsively running on it, like Sky Pile-It dave compulsively spouts
claims that have been proven false over and over again.
Not meaning to insult any Hamsters out there.
BDK
|
