Re: SUPERSTAR WILLIE NELSON JOINS WITH 911 TRUTHERS

> And none of the above list is speaking within their area of expertise.
> Just like you.

Did I mention generalizations before?
Anyway, I'll leave you to whatever it is
you're doing.

Here's a quote from the NIST re****t
about changing the evidence:

"The more severe case (which became Case
B for WTC 1 and Case D for WTC 2) was
used for the global analysis of each
tower. Complete sets of simulations were
then
performed for Cases B and D. To the
extent that the simulations deviated
from the
photographic evidence or eyewitness
re****ts [e.g., complete collapse
occurred], the
investigators adjusted the input, but
only within the range of physical
reality. Thus,
for instance,…the pulling forces on the
perimeter columns by the sagging floors
were adjusted...  (NIST, 2005, p. 142;
emphasis added.)
The primary role of the floors in the
collapse of the towers was to provide
inward
pull forces that induced inward bowing
of perimeter columns. (NIST, 2005, p. 180;
emphasis added.)"

--

NIST contracted with Underwriters
Laboratories, Inc. to conduct tests to
obtain
information on the fire endurance of
trusses like those in the WTC towers…. All
four test specimens sustained the
maximum design load for approximately 2
hours
without collapsing… The Investigation
Team was cautious about using these results
directly in the formulation of collapse
hypotheses. In addition to the scaling
issues raised
by the test results, the fires in the
towers on September 11, and the
resulting exposure of
the floor systems, were substantially
different from the conditions in the
test furnaces.
Nonetheless, the [empirical test]
results established that this type of
assembly was
capable of sustaining a large gravity
load, without collapsing, for a substantial
period of time relative to the duration
of the fires in any given location on
September 11.  (NIST, 2005, p. 141;
emphasis added.)