Re: Will the next "inside job" terror attack be blamed on 911

On May 29, 12:08 pm, "Freedom Fighter" <libe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Substantial physical evidence, hard proof, is in the hands of several
people
> and groups - such things as residue proving the use of demolition
explosives
> to bring down the THREE collapsed WTC buildings. Your denial does not
> invalidate the evidence that will hopefully be presented in the
appropriate
> court.

I was wondering how you came to find such evidence? Actually having
explosive residue found at GZ. That would be the "smoking gun" on any
cover up. Can you show me where this "proof" is located so it can be
examined by real experts and not a out of work professor proving that
the building had drywall and steel beams in its construction?