Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Military Retired Politics > Re: Something t...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 30 of 43 Topic 981 of 1052
Post > Topic >>

Re: Something to ponder (fwd)

by Defendario <Defendario@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 27, 2007 at 10:24 PM

Seawolf wrote:
> "Defendario" <Defendario@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:549jt3F1vstdnU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Seawolf wrote:
>>> "Defendario" <Defendario@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:544hfuF1ul7nbU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Hertz_Donut wrote:
>>>>> "Defendario" <Defendario@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>>> news:54464eF1ul8vlU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> GeorgeWa****ngtonAdmirer wrote:
>>>>>>> "JM" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So.. Lets say I break into your house, when you discover this you
ask 
>>>>>>> me to leave. But I say, "I've made the beds, washed the dishes and

>>>>>>> did the
>>>>>>> laundry well as swept the floors: I've done all the things you
don't 
>>>>>>> like to do.
>>>>>>> I'm hard- working and honest, except for when I broke into your 
>>>>>>> house, and deserve to stay". Now according to the protestors , not

>>>>>>> only must you let me stay
>>>>>> Hold the freekn bus, Homer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless you are of Native American extraction, and there are few 
>>>>>> purebred Redmen left, you are an immigrant or of immigrants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is so wrong with a person from Latin America seeking to live
the 
>>>>>> American Dream, or at least to aspire to live in the land of
Freedom?
>>> Nothing, as long as they abide by the law.
>>>
>> So you favor amnesty for the hard working, law abiding Mexicans.
>> 8-)
> 
> Yes, as long as they entered the country legally, if they didn't then
they 
> aren't law abiding........
>

Bull****, Seamouse.  The legal-illegal distinction is artificial, and 
meaningless.

>>>>>> The inscription on the Statue of Liberty reads...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Give me your tired, your poor,
>>>>>> Your huddled m***** yearning to breathe free,
>>>>>> The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
>>>>>> Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.
>>>>>> I lift my lamp beside the golden door."
>>>
>>> How many of our current "Latin Americans of questionable citeszen****p"

>>> can quote that, let alone claim to have seen the Statue of Liberty?
>>>
>> That's irrelevant.  It's one of the key traditions of America
> 
> True, it is one of the key traditions of America, what isn't true is
your 
> first sentence.
>

Whatever the fuk that's supposed to mean.

>>>>>> Why are you unAmerican, Georgie?  Why do you hate America, and
destroy 
>>>>>> her sacred traditions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A tradition of welcoming hardworking immigrants which lasted
hundreds 
>>>>>> of years, in fact.  It is the essence of the American experiment.
>>> True.  But purposely eveading the law of America is NOT!
>>>
>> Make it feasible for them to obey.  They aren't trained monkeys, eager
to 
>> jump thru bureaucratic hoops.  The mojados just want to work.
> 
> 
> So, you're all for them ignoring our laws....not paying SS or taxes?

Wets pay the most taxes.  They get withholding taken out, and can't get 
refunds because -- they're on the wrong SSN!

> I have 
> no problem with immigrants who enter this country legally, I have a real

> problem with those who enter illegally, don't pay taxes and insist that
the 
> US provide everything in espanol as well............
>

Let them be legal, and you'll feel much better.

They're already here and working anyway.

>>>>> Your point is, sadly, irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>> Your point to prove, Reichtard.
>>> Nope, yours.
>>>
>> What point?  Do you have one?
> 
> Yes.  To bad you aren't bright enough to get it.
>

The irony...

> 
>>>>> The average immigrant is illegal, does not pay taxes, uses our
social 
>>>>> programs and our medical system without paying for them, put their
kids 
>>>>> in our schools without paying taxes..etc.
>>>>>
>>>> Your insinuation is a baldfaced lie.  Most of the illegal Mexican 
>>>> workers I worked alongside paid taxes out of every paycheck, but were

>>>> unable to obtain tax returns because of the fraudulent SSN.
>>> You are a fool if you believe what you just said.
>> I believe it because I know it to be true.  Every wet I worked with
(and 
>> there were hundreds) worked for a paycheck and had taxes taken out.
> 
> I guess I should take your "word" for it.....you've proven to be so 
> believable and intelligent so far....LOL!
>

Go ahead with your delusions.  You are ineducable.

> 
>>> .....let's not even deal with the FACT that you are criminal if you 
>>> knowingly worked with ILLEGAL immegrants and said nothing.............
>>>
>> Said nothing?  Who the fuk was I supposed to tell?  Have La Migra haul
all 
>> my compadres away, and leave me with no crew to work on?
>>
>> Are you mad?
> 
> Nope, just a law abiding citizen.  You, obviously, are not.
>

You're an idiot.  You better stay in the service -- the real world will 
be too tough for a goof like you.

> 
>>>> Low wage earners don't pay for hospitalization, social services or 
>>>> schools either if they are native or immigrant, fool.
>>> No, they don't.  They rely on the fact that tax paying citizens of the

>>> country they are illegaly in will pay for the care they
recieve.....and 
>>> Americans wonder why our insurance rates are so high..........
>>>
>> American insurance rates would be a lot lower across the board with a 
>> Canadian style system.
> 
> 
> Ahhhhhhhhhh, the socialized health care system argument.  That was
destroyed 
> back in the '90s..............
>

Every other industrialized nation on Earth, and many non-industrial 
ones, have universal health coverage.  Only the pigheaded US persists in 
its antiquated system.

> 
>> Everyone who gets sick or injured in America
>> ought to have a right to treatment.  Period.
> 
> 
> Everyone who is a citizen?  Or are you saying that if they break our
laws 
> and are here illegally they should have that "right" as well?
>

Everyone.  That means everyone, for idiots like you.

> 
>>>> Your argument lacks merit.  It's basically a lie.
>>> No, your rebuttal lacks merit.
> 
> No, you're "argument"(and I'm being kind here) is flawed and lacks
merit.
>

???

> 
>> Rebuttal of what?
>>
>>>>> If an immigrant wants to come here legally, get a work permit and
visa, 
>>>>> and ultimately gain citizen****p, I commend and welcome them.
>>>>>
>>>> That isn't a realistic option for the numbers of persons were talking

>>>> about.  The demand for visas far outstrips supply.  Well qualified 
>>>> applicants are left wanting.
>>>
>>> Spoken like a true idiot......
>>>
>> You never cease to amaze me Seamouse.
> 
> I'm sure I don't.  I bet you say that to anyone who has greater than a
5th 
> grade education.........
>

Retard.  You cannot hold a candle to my intellect.

>>> Why is it okay for Mexico to apprehend or shoot people trying to cross

>>> their Southern border illegally, but somehow, we (the USA) are
supposed 
>>> to allow anyone to break OUR laws to enter our country?
>>>
>> When does that ever happen?  What American was shot by Federales?
> 
> Read the ENTIRE statement before making yourself look like an 
> idiot..........
>

You are a lying sack of ****.  IOW the Federales haven't shot anyone.

>>>>> Most of the "immigrants" don't want citizen****p.  They want to get
jobs 
>>>>> paid under the table so that they can send the money back home, so
that 
>>>>> they are not taxed.  They want to use our system to benefit them, 
>>>>> without paying anything in return.  They are parasites, plain and 
>>>>> simple.
>>>>>
>>>> That is a huge lie.
>>> Which is why the majority of the GNP of Mexico is American 
>>> dollars.....right?
>>>
>> Proof of this bizarre assertion?
> 
> Google "Mexico GNP"  to many cites to list............
>

I don't really understand the concept of one country's GNP being 
another's.  That seems gimmicky.  WTF?

>>>   Most of the Mexican workers I knew yearned for
>>>> citizen****p and equal rights in America.
>>>
>>> Then why aren't you condeming the country they came from?
>>>
>> Why should I?  What difference would it make if I did?
> 
> You're right.  Who'd listen to an idiot like you?
>

Don't.  Killfile me and be done with it.

I only fiddle with you for cheap entertainment.  You have nothing of 
interest to offer.

> 
>>>   They did not work under the
>>>> table, and produced far more social benefit than they ever cost.
>>>
>>> What would that be?  The money that tax payers have spent to make sure

>>> that all menus are in English and Spanish?
>>>
>> What tax payer money ever printed a menu?
> 
> Wow!  Keep showing your idiocy!  Economics 101 wasn't your strength, was
it?
>

You can't show a single example.  You lose.

>> The reason why service institutions cater to the Hispanic population is

>> because those people have money to spend.  Government institutions
ought 
>> to be accessible to those who are here but lack the ability to
understand 
>> English.  They still have human rights, Seamouse, even if they don't 
>> speakee the Anglaiz
> 
> Hope you speak espanol moron, it's people as ignorant as you who are
going 
> to allow it to be the dominant language.....
>

Why should I worry?  I was born white, and thus have a leg up on all 
Mexicans

>>>> You are a parasite, Hoe Gnu.  You have never worked an honest day in 
>>>> your life I warrant.
>>>>
>>>>> Note that the above does not apply to the immigrants who enter this 
>>>>> country legally and follow all the necessary steps.
>>>>>
>>>> Your artificial distinction does not impress me.
>>>
>>> Why would anyone worry about impressing someone like you?  You've
already 
>>> admitted to a felony..........
>>>
>> What felony?  To failing to re****t undocs to the migra?
> 
> Yes.
>

You're a retard.  No reasonable likelihood of a conviction of that case.

>> LOL, what an idiot you are, Seamouse.
>> :-D
> 
> LOL what a moron you are.  You prove it everytime you post....keep at it

> though, I could use the down-time from debating intelligent
people......... 
> :-)
>

"Intelligent people" surely doesn't include you.

> 
>>>>> I also think we need to end the welfare state.  When a healthy
person 
>>>>> born in this country can go their entire life without ever having to

>>>>> hold a job...something is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>> If a man promised to do not a lick of work, he ought to be given a 
>>>> stipend so as not to be forced to steal.  Wages will go up when
workers 
>>>> voluntarily retire from work, and jobs go begging.  Better wages will

>>>> draw some back to the workforce.
>>> Who?
>>>
>> Workers, dumbass.  Reread what I wrote until it sinks in.
>>
>>>> All society benefits from giving subsistence to the needy.  Beggary
and 
>>>> street crime impoverish everyone by destroying the quality of life.
>>>
>>> Yeah, worked great for the USSR......
>>>
>> Actually it worked well there, until the crazed military spending of
the 
>> USSR torpedoed the economy.  Social services were quite good for the
lower 
>> cl***** in fUSSR.  Only after glasnost did people begin to suffer.
>>
>>>>> Do not post back that someone has to take care of their kids...they
are 
>>>>> expert at squeezing out a new dollar maker just in time to keep the 
>>>>> benefits rolling in....no benefits, no kids!  Simple equation.  Of 
>>>>> course, the dems would love the entire country to be one huge
welfare 
>>>>> state, so they could control us all!
>>>>>
>>>> You are a lunatic.  Seek psychiatric help.
>>> You are ignorant.....educate yourself....relying on the TV doesn't
help 
>>> you!
>>>
>> I seldom watch TV Seamouse.  Stay away from Freepers and other
Reichwing 
>> sources.  Bone up on your New Testament, while you're at it.  Develop
some 
>> compassion for those who struggle.
>>

I notice you befuddled silence on these last few points.

Your concession of defeat is graciously accepted.
 




 43 Posts in Topic:
Something to ponder (fwd)
GeorgeWashingtonAdmirer &  2007-02-21 10:29:44 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-21 19:26:18 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-21 14:59:53 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-21 22:40:09 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-21 19:58:16 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-23 20:38:33 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-23 17:06:38 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-24 22:45:18 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-24 17:55:21 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-24 23:16:05 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-24 18:18:50 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"David R" <h  2007-02-25 06:33:59 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-24 23:08:36 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"David R" <h  2007-02-26 03:25:08 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-25 21:23:07 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"David R" <h  2007-02-26 09:09:10 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-25 23:19:23 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"David R" <h  2007-02-26 17:38:53 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-25 19:18:14 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"David R" <h  2007-02-26 03:27:56 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-25 22:39:08 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-25 21:23:45 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"David R" <h  2007-02-26 09:09:59 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-25 23:21:05 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
AUK Registrar <cjiii@[  2007-02-25 16:58:42 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Seawolf" <S  2007-02-22 01:16:13 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-23 20:52:00 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-02-23 17:27:32 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Seawolf" <S  2007-02-27 18:56:52 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-27 22:24:17 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Tom" <tomtk  2007-02-27 23:13:34 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-27 23:24:08 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Tom" <tomtk  2007-02-28 08:57:18 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-28 17:25:55 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
AUK Registrar <cjiii@[  2007-03-01 18:33:19 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Seawolf" <S  2007-02-28 23:11:37 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-02-28 23:34:15 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Seawolf" <S  2007-03-01 00:02:33 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Tom" <tomtk  2007-03-01 00:50:17 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-03-03 21:10:06 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Hertz_Donut" &  2007-03-03 16:49:59 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
Defendario <Defendario  2007-03-03 22:27:55 
Re: Something to ponder (fwd)
"Tom" <tomtk  2007-03-03 21:51:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 6:15:13 CST 2008.