CONTINUED FROM PART I
Updated 10/18/2001: Made easier to print out
Well, the establishers of this nation have long been saying that there
was an "enemy" to the nation: an army, so to speak, which is intent on
destroying the principles which guide this nation. We today seem to
have forgotten this. Do such a people exist today? Who might these
people be?
The question is, while we are all in diversity and entertain many
different and conflicting ideas about everything, could it be possible
that this "enemy" army actually does not debate about anything, but is
incredibly unified in belief? If there existed two armies of equal
weapons and manpower force ready to engage in battle, and one army had
soldiers who were incredibly unified and agreed in everything
pertaining to the war in every particular, against the other which had
all kinds of diverse views, which army would win? Is it possible that
this seeming parable of two armies is an actual expression of what is
going on today?
Is it possible that there is a secret and unified army among us who
effect those whom we elect for public office? Is it possible that
while we absent ourselves from voting in protest of the candidates for
public office, this invisible army votes and chooses who will lead of
its own will? NOT ONLY ARE ALL THESE THINGS POSSIBLE, THAT IS EXACTLY
WHAT IS ACTUALLY TAKING PLACE IN SOCIETY TODAY!!
"Oh!" you may say: "I don't believe in conspiracy theories! I don't
believe in anything that cannot be proved!" Well you've been listening
to the "theories" of Evolution all your life. Do you remember one
moment in your life when these "theories" were ever proven? Since you
are in an environment of diversity and love different views, why do
you scorn those who honestly believe there is a conspiracy? Isn't that
strange? Just hear me out for a second. PLEASE LISTEN! You'll be able
to see why this DIVERSITY which we are told is the source of our
strength is necessary for the changes which are taking place today,
and ultimately necessary FOR OUR DESTRUCTION!
The question is, if I wanted the clear answers as to what is the best
course to be pursued to ensure the prosperity of this nation, would it
help me if I solicited the answers from the general public or the
citizens of the United States? Automatically your answer would be no.
Why? The answer would be because I would get many different and
conflicting answers. The American people would prove to me that they
don't know what they're talking about. The conclusion therefore would
be, "WILL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE LEAD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?" The
answer is no. WHO THEN WILL LEAD? The answer as to who will lead will
fall upon the only other option which exists in society. Which is
what?
The ones who will lead will be the ones who can be the only
beneficiaries of this diversity we are told is the secret of our
strength: those in positions of influence and authority. This is
because those who occupy positions of influence and authority are
supposed to be bound by written rules. What if those written rules can
be rendered "interpretable" or can be reinterpreted to mean opposite
from what they were originally intended to mean? If the American
people are "suckered" into making everything subjective, how can they
stop such actions? Can you use the Constitution of the United States
to appeal against the changes taking place in government today? Those
enforcing the changes say no, and tell you that if you resist the
changes or claim that the Constitution is opposed to those changes,
you have misinterpreted the Constitution: you merely interpret it
differently from other people. In the DIVERSITY, people can interpret
the Constitution many different ways. When that happens, leadership
can then enforce the illegal changes with no one able to stop them.
This therefore shows us who is going to benefit from the
diversity--who are the prime beneficiaries of this diversity we are
told is the secret of our strength: those in positions of influence
and authority!
Ladies and gentlemen: Do yourselves a favor and preserve your dignity!
If you live in a society where there are all kinds of different and
differing views canceling each other out, will earth shattering
political and ideological trends and motions contrary to our
established order develop? We admit there is a possibility that trends
could already exist if one particular idea had a sizeable majority
over the other or others. But new political and ideological trends
absolutely cannot develop out of thin air--certainly not out of a
diverse society! Our present system of government would therefore
actually be preserved under diversity if it was truly a genuine and
beneficial principle. YOU CAN'T HAVE CHANGE WHEN EVERYONE IS IN
DIVERSE OPINIONS TUGGING AT DIFFERENT SIDES OF A ROPE! MORESO YOU
CAN'T HAVE CHANGE WHILE WITH THIS CONFUSION, A MAJORITY OF SOCIETY
OPPOSES IT. Why then are we having change anyway??
The interesting fact is however that new political and ideological
trends DID develop and are developing. Amazingly, those who resist
these trends and changes among those who live in the United States ARE
the majority, for a change involves transforming society from what it
originally was, therefore naturally starting only with a minority to
initiate and develop the changes. Amazingly, this sizeable majority
which opposes the changes, IS LOSING! How can this be!!
Please think for a moment: If I was to make the statement that our
churches and government are mostly controlled by despots, would you
believe me? A despot is a person who is tyrannical. Not only does he
not care about your opinions, he doesn't even believe that you have
rights to your property, free speech, or even your lives against his
desires. I therefore have to make a very bold statement: There are
more despots living around you today than at any other time in the
history of the earth! This fact and condition will cause a "time of
trouble such as was not since there was a nation" and "even to that
same time." Do you agree with that statement? You may well disagree,
for you would tell me that you don't see any. I would agree that you
practically don't see any; but there is a reason for that.
If a despot stepped up to a microphone in order to work for his
purposes in cheating you out of your liberties, how would he go about
it? If his words were in line with his real intentions, he would
proudly approach the microphone and state:
"ALL RIGHT! FROM NOW ON EVERYBODY HAS TO LISTEN TO ME! THERE ARE NO
"IFS" "ANDS" OR "BUTS." YOU MUST DO WHAT I SAY AND SURRENDER ALL TO ME
NOW!! YOU MUST TELL ME EVERYTHING YOU KNOW, ALL YOUR PRIVATE
INFORMATION, AND YOU MUST SUBMIT TO HAVING DETECTION DEVICES INSTALLED
IN YOUR HOMES SO THAT I CAN LISTEN IN AND VIEW ON THE THINGS THAT YOU
ARE SAYING AND DOING!!"
You and I therefore know that no one would step before a microphone
and make statements like these! If you did that and the Joe-six packs,
the truckers, the motorcycle riders, etc. heard you make statements
like these, you would be in BIG TROUBLE! They would know clearly that
you are a despot, and, upon that knowledge, despots would become
extinct. It is therefore only natural that despots would come or show
themselves in a much different way. That way is that they would step
up to the microphone and continually tell the people how it is great
to have all kinds of different opinions. That's what they are doing
now. THAT IS WHY YOU CANNOT SEE THEM!!
But you may say that those who love freedom state this also. That is
not true. They tell the people that they have a right to state their
honest beliefs, but they do not say that the result is an ideal
condition, nor even a beneficial one especially if ideas are not
tested fairly one against another. Confusion profits no one. What they
do is that they allow people to state their honest views with the
intent that all can find truth, and one of the most important aspects
of finding truth comes from their ideas being tested and competing
fairly, so that one day with honest searching people would ultimately
come to a mutual understanding and be as one. They present their ideas
in discussion. That way others will be able to see the merits of each
and will be able to determine who may be right or wrong if they find a
reliable standard to judge by. In the early days of this nation, the
standard was the bible.
In order to thwart this, you would notice despots all over the
internet, while we are exposing concepts, enter in to reply to us that
we are "sick-puppies," we need to continue to take our "meds," we need
to make "another" call to our psychiatrists, etc., WITHOUT EVEN
ATTEMPTING TO DEAL WITH WHAT WE HAVE WRITTEN OR CHALLENGE IT. Often
you will find them trailing our posts with replies containing just a
small sentence of two emanating insults and hatred. Even though these
people claim we are so mentally deranged, THEY LIVE ON OUR POSTS! Is
it common sense for sane people to live their lives on the posts of
those they claim are insane? There is clearly an agenda to corrupt
DISCUSSION and a testing of ideas over the internet. After appealing
constantly for them to even show us why we need such mental help, the
accusers merely continue to make the statement without a reason; for
to give a reason itself would be suicidal.
It is therefore unfortunate that the words of the despots would be
close to the words of those who genuinely love freedom. It is
sometimes hard to tell them apart. We will more discuss how to tell
them apart in other articles on this web site.
Yet, besides what we see taking place in our society, it is clear that
unconscionable changes are also determinedly taking place in the
churches AND IN THE SAME WAY, while religious leaders are also hailing
the necessity for DIVERSITY. The developments that are flooding in
upon us are labeled "NEW", yet those developments ALWAYS CONSISTENTLY
challenge the foundation principles the United States and all the
churches used to have. Church and state is being attacked and
transformed. CHURCH AND STATE! IS THIS REALLY JUST BY ACCIDENT!!
Religious leaders are everywhere pushing rock, jazz and pop music
(among others) into the divine services of all the churches even
though a very sizeable majority resist these changes and demand
justification for them based upon the doctrines and tenets of their
respective church bodies. Religious leaders are struggling to make
sure that the churches do not teach doctrine nor anything that would
allow them to stand upon their own principles so that they can make
their own decisions. They are telling the churches that "Christ" is
all that they need, and inspire and even force them to do nothing but
celebrate "Christ and His salvation" so that they can be dumbed down.
Right and wrong, the proper functioning of their churches and the
proper functioning of their countries, the understanding of biblical
prophecy, are being forced out of their consciousness, while these
things are being changed by super-political experts: THE VERY PEOPLE
WHO ARE TELLING OTHERS TO FOCUS ONLY UPON CHRIST! If focusing on
Christ gives you such a political talent and a talent to control and
manipulate, please demonstrate to me how!
Though the bible possesses 66 books of information, they urge people
to only study small portions which talk only about Jesus, and not even
all the scriptures dealing with Christ at that. They are pushing for a
one world global religion, while our national leaders are struggling
to form a one world international order. This has caused unprecedented
distrust of leadership in both church and state. Religious leaders
also have not been taking no for an answer, but are, in the same way,
also publishing their astonishment that their members would not trust
them while they continue to push the changes against all objections,
and, like political leadership, do the self-same things which caused
the distrust. Again, since diverse views prevail in these religious
bodies, religious leadership replies to those resisting change, that
the Bible and the rules established by their respective churches
cannot be used to appeal against the changes, for people have
different interpretations of those rules. The only thing therefore
left that can be established as definite authority in both church and
state IS THE DECISIONS OF THE LEADERS! AMAZING! ALL THE PRINCIPLES OF
OUR SOCIETY REVERSED THROUGH A MOST DECEPTIVE PHILOSOPHY!! It is
amazing the field-day many in positions of power and influence are
having over the people!
Therefore, as one purpose we can establish for the diversity, we
notice that the voices of those who would warn us or resist the
changes would be canceled out. When others stand in the way telling us
that nothing is wrong and that there is no conspiracy, then every
active idea or impression alerting us to the danger we are in will be
canceled out. When others tell us that they don't see anything wrong
with the changes taking place, society is left to the mercy of the
ruling bodies which pump out the new rules. If you are in a diverse
society where all ideas cancel each other out, be alarmed if you still
yet notice unified rules, decrees and trends encouraging change
continuing to pump out of Washington, or from denominational
headquarters: YOU ARE UNDER A CONSPIRACY!
You don't think so? Well why then not ask yourselves the question as
to why the politicians in Washington do not cancel each other out
also? If there are leaders determining to enforce change, why are
there not others who would oppose such changes and therefore stop the
motion of the changes? The answer is because those who are enforcing
the changes really do not like nor believe in DIVERSITY. They are not
bound to it. For them themselves to accept diversity would be to
jeopardize their treacherous aims, for a diverse government would not
be enforcing any change! THESE ARE THE ENEMIES OUR FOREFATHERS WARNED
US ABOUT!! A quick quote on their usual tactics...
In the early 1960s, when the United States Supreme Court prohibited
prayer and Bible reading in schools, for a considerable number of
American evangelicals, education plunged from complaint to despair.
Since then, many have judged that public schools have become
increasingly secular, immoral, academically inferior, and unpatriotic.
To make matters worse, PUBLIC SCHOOLS HAVE BECOME INDIFFERENT AND EVEN
HOSTILE TO PARENTS AND CHILDREN WHO HOLD A BIBLE-CENTERED WORLD VIEW.
AS CHRISTIANS THEY FEEL OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM. IN A TIME WHEN EDUCATORS
OFTEN SPEAK ABOUT "PLURALISM" AND "DIVERSITY," EVANGELICALS WONDER WHY
THEY HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED MORE TOLERANCE AND UNDERSTANDING IN THE
PUBLIC SCHOOLS. INSTEAD THEY FEEL LIKE A DISCRIMINATED-AGAINST
MINORITY. The titles of recent books published by the fundamentalist
wing give abundant evidence of their present frustration with American
public education: Schools on Fire, Your Children: The Victims of
Public Education, and Public Education: The River of Pollution are but
a few of those published in recent years. -- p. 15. Dr. Frank C.
Nelsen, in his book Public Schools (An Evangelical Appraisal)
In His Grace,
Susan
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
|
