CONTINUED FROM PART III
Updated 10/18/2001: Made easier to print out
Many concerned citizens and organizations lament the fact that even
respected and established government and political groups are found
contradicting each other, causing grid-lock, and outright don't seem
to know what they're doing. These concerned people have seen a Miami
police officer pronounced guilty of murder by an esteemed court for
shooting a black man riding a motorcycle, to then be pronounced
innocent by another esteemed court in a later trial. They see men of
esteem and renown continually contradicting each other while the
business of preserving our system continues to deteriorate, while all
the while the people involved with the responsibility of preserving
our system, are constantly hailing the virtue of that philosophy which
is crippling the whole system: DIVERSITY. They tell us this diversity
is wonderful! Our people see even the supreme court making decisions
and then thinking to reverse them later. Everything points to the need
for a singular voice and the elimination of individual rights. ALL
ROADS LEAD TO ROME!
That's what many in these offices of public trust are there to prove!
They are there to mess up the system by putting it into endless
debate, reha****ng and re-evaluating old controversies and contentions
which were formerly solved, enacting rules and principles which are
designed to destroy the system, etc. The system running into chaos,
confusion and collapse does not humiliate nor weaken Rome: it
strengthens Rome and guarantees her future domination of the world.
That's why Rome thrives on debate, confusion and controversy, and the
great debating our nation is currently doing should make any
sound-minded person understand that it is under a tremendous barrage
of attack from the inside. THE NATION THAT DEBATES WILL BE OVERCOME BY
THE ONE THAT DOES NOT. THE CHURCH THAT DEBATES WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE
CHURCH THAT DOES NOT! Whenever there are debates on the internet and
someone comes with points that are strong enough to finalize any
issue, Jesuits posting on those systems will begin to get concerned
and will begin to move in and act to use all kinds of well-trained
techniques in order to oppose that person with the strong points and
to allow the debate to continue endlessly. That's also why those
involved in the conspiracy seem to agree that a one-world government
is a good thing. If they put even an eighth of the effort into our
system they are pu****ng for this global government, all our problems
would be solved!
What therefore is the difference between encouraging diverse ideas and
interpretations from the Bible and burning bibles which Rome has done
for centuries? The answer is that there really would be no difference.
It was for this very reason of confusion why the Protestant
Reformation even started. It started because certain Catholics
typically among the elite (for the bible was not readily accessible to
the common people in those days) discovered that they were not getting
accurate spiritual information from the Roman Church by what they had
read and experienced in the Scriptures. They then lamented the
division and confusion that was evident in various branches and eras
of the Roman Church. They then later became Protestants.
The Protestants said the following. I am now going to quote from a
notable Protestant writer, a William Chillingworth, who in these words
testify to the complete mission of Protestantism. This is from his
book called The Religion of Protestants which was published in 1866.
He said:
The Bible, I say, the Bible only, is the religion of Protestants! I
for my part, after a long and (as I verily believe and hope) impartial
search of 'the true way to eternal happiness,' do profess plainly that
I cannot find any rest for the sole of my foot but upon this rock
only. I see plainly and with my own eyes, that there are popes against
popes, councils against councils, some fathers against others, the
same fathers against themselves, a consent of fathers of one age
against a consent of fathers of another age, the church of one age
against the church of another age.
In a word, there is no sufficient CERTAINTY but of Scripture only for
any considering man to build upon. -- William Chillingworth, M.A., The
Religion of Protestants, (London 1866), 463.
Notice what they wanted? They wanted CERTAINTY! They wanted clear and
definitive information which can be demonstrated by the Scriptures. Do
Protestants want certainty today? This is in contrast with Jesuit
posters on the internet telling us about inferior Christians who want
clear answers from the bible on issues not dealing directly with
Christ.
That's the way Jesus used the Scriptures in His day. He did not tell
the conflicting factions of the Jewish Church that they were blessed
in their different and confusing theories. Though He lived and taught
in a great center of commerce, He did not impress any kind of
im****tance to racial or cultural diversity. He did not impress any
kind of recognition nor necessity for all kinds of differing opinions
or views. He did not tell them to forget about what is right or true
in order to unite in "Love" and "e***enism". Instead He continually
showed both the Pharisees and the Saduccees how much in error they
were. He did this with power, with definitiveness and with surety.
THAT IS THE POWER OF THE BIBLE, and IT WAS THAT POWER WHICH PRESERVED
OUR LIBERTIES TO THIS DAY.
Therefore the typical scenario would be a minority brought in for
trial on the charge of heresy by the Roman Catholic Church. They would
be asked why they were spreading heresy. They would reply that what
they were spreading was not heresy but the TRUTH. They would then
state that the Roman Church had apostatized from the truth. Rome would
then typically retort, "From your interpretation?"
The idea was, how can a few humble, penniless, uneducated peasants
declare that the decisions and interpretations of the educated,
affluent and opulent elite of Rome were wrong? The typical questions
would be, "Are you saying that you're right and everyone else is
wrong? How come everybody else doesn't see what you see? ARE YOU
SAYING YOU ARE GOING TO LEAD! Are you saying that your views will
dominate?"
How did the Protestants escape the charge of being "dogmatic" and
"selfishly intent on pu****ng their own self-made half-made views" on
everyone else? How did they escape the charge of being "bigoted,"
dogmatic and egotistical? They escaped by always offering the
challenge, "Show me my error from the Scriptures, and I will retract!"
IT WAS THEREFORE SHOWN THAT THROUGH EXAMINATION THE PEOPLE CAN
UNDERSTAND THAT THE BIBLE IS DEFINITIVE. It doesn't condone a plethora
of opinions in anything neither of a doctrinal, political nor moral
nature!
The Protestants were saying that the Scriptures were definitive. They
were giving authority to the scriptures and taking it off of
themselves, thus proving that they were not on any ego trip. Most
don't seem to understand that even the accusation against the
Protestants here were the cornerstone accusations against those who
opposed the Nazis and Communists. Hitler's famous work Mein Kampf
which embodied the moral philosophy of Nazism was based on the concept
that everyone must release his individual and "selfish" opinions in
order to serve his fellow man. Serving his fellow man was just another
way of saying that he will believe and follow his government no matter
what--even into totaliterians realms. He will follow with the agenda
of the dictator or who else is there regardless of the moral or
political implications. Whosoever doesn't do that is "selfish" and is
on an ego-trip. This is directly opposite to the Protestant concept.
The Protestants were declaring that in debate, the Scriptures were the
referee, and that their knowledge of it can be challenged and tested.
Here was a strong indicator of the supernatural quality of
Protestantism: OF THE BIBLE. Just as seemingly impossible it was for a
book falling into the hands of diverse people to produce unity and
definitive guidance, so it must have been for humble peasants to
defend themselves against the elite and great minds of Rome.
The interesting fact was that those humble peasants were all too often
able to confound and defeat the great men of Rome, proving that the
Bible was definitive and does give such guidance to anyone. That was
why Rome consistently made it a high priority to, as much as possible,
make sure that the Protestants never had a chance to speak nor to
defend themselves--especially when honest observers are around, for
there was really no such thing as trials in Vatican dogma. Once you
were condemned by the Vatican, that was it. There was no more to be
said in your behalf by anyone else, and especially no more to be said
by you. That's why during the days of the inquisitions the Roman
Catholic hierarchy pressed upon the people that they were not to
listen to what "egotistical" individuals proclaimed from what they
conceived to be truth coming from the Bible. The people of those dark
ages were taught to adhere to the decisions of the COMMUNITY: to what
society on a whole decreed and decided; and, of course, it was a fact
that the ideas the majority of society had held, came from the elite
who were controlling them. This political philosophy is called
"Collectivism", and it was not only a vital part of Vatican policy,
but also an intergral part of its offshoots: Socialism, Communism, and
Nazism.
In the recent events with the changes taking place in church and
state, it is evident that there is a high priority to make sure that
opposing or "dissident" groups or people do not get a chance to speak
or to defend themselves when they are condemned for opposing
authority--the very authority which is enforcing the changes.
In the former anti-terrorism bill, the Clinton Administration had
added a provision where they can actually condemn any group which they
declare is a terrorist group whether whimsically or otherwise, through
secret evidence without allowing the accused to be confronted with the
charges or to defend themselves against the charges. Such actions are
clearly unconstitutional--CLEARLY DARK AGES GOVERNMENT, and are the
very acts which have caused militia and patriot groups to spring up,
yet those in authority are absolutely determined that these acts MUST
continue--THAT WE MUST GET USED TO ACTS LIKE THESE, while they ****tray
to the public that they just can't understand why anyone would not
trust them but would choose to believe in, according to them,
"conspiracy theories."
Yet people believing in conspiracies are supposed to be considered the
natural results of a diverse society--of that DIVERSITY which they
have brought upon us and indoctrinated us to believe is the secret of
OUR strength. Diversity would justify people believing in ANYTHING,
including that our government and churches are betraying them and
trying to rule and control them for the benefit of the New World
Order, under their Pope. Instead of this, those who understand the
established order of our society and realize that it is being
unscrupulously attacked, are labeled "dissidents" by those who tell us
they love diversity, and yet this charge is not accompanied by any
allowance for people to disagree--is not accompanied by any allowance
for DIVERSITY. In the process, most every meeting those in authority
have is not to consider what might be taking place which is causing
the protest, distrust and unrest so that a solution can be found, but
they meet to figure out how to discredit and to destroy those who are
trying to sound the alarm while yet making sure that the activities
which caused the distrust continue to the point where the American
people get used to them. They don't meet in order to figure out the
distrust, BECAUSE THEY ALREADY KNOW WHAT IS CAUSING IT! Still their
mission is clear: this free America must fall and give place to the
New World Order, which we will find out will be a much more powerful
replica of that form of government which our nation won its liberties
from: the "Holy" Roman empire. Therefore it is clear that those who
push diversity upon us really do not believe in it, but are indeed
conspiring against us.
To see the last part, go here:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/DiversityV.html
In His Grace,
Susan
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
|
