On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:13:17 -0500, "DropCloth" <delexnkt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams07171964II@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:b5mdu0595acecer5n22n1ll8u3l9o9rcnm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> WATCH JESUIT TALENT GALORE AND LEARN WHAT IS TAUGHT THE SCOUNDRELS OF
>> THE VATICAN BEHIND ITS WALLS...
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:41:23 -0500, "DropCloth" <delexnkt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >First of all, YOU have trivialized this whole subject of who should
die
>or
>> >live that you love so much to rant about.
>>
>> Super-damned Jesuit heard that people posted that all non-Catholics
>> must die. He did not even inquire for the proof. He takes it upon
>> himself to trivialize a much more im****tant subject like a Jesuit
>> would. BILLIONS OF LIVES...
>
>Ah, so now I am a "Super" damned Jesuit because I pointed out how
>hypcritical you are because you ignore all the other hate mongers out
there
>and reserve all of your venom for just one or two people who seem to want
>you dead.
I DON'T HAVE TO REHEARSE ALL THE HATEMONGERS AND KILLERS IN THE WORLD
TO THE GREATEST GROUP OF HATEMONGERS AND KILLERS IN THE WORLD...
ONLY WHEN I'M EXPOSING THE WORST ONES WHO TELL US ALL NON-CATHOLICS
MUST DIE!
Next point he rehearses Muslims committing atrocities and people
committing atrocities against Blacks. Even on this point these are
issues we hear everyday...
DO YOU HEAR ON THE NEWS ABOUT PEOPLE POSTING THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS
MUST DIE????
This is certainly unusual, but this jesuit must act like the other
ones and not only mostly pretend it is not there, make all kinds of
rules we have to follow that we don't need to follow if we condemn or
expose Osama!
You're a Jesuit. You will continue to steady walk to deceit and
damnation!
You never require anyone condemning Osama nor any other animal to
rehearse the world of terrorist!
>FYI, for the rest of this post I just snipped the repetition out because,
>well because it's repetitious and is used only as an unclever diversion
so
>you don;t have to answer the questions. In its place I put :-) as
another
>small protest against hate.
This super-damned Jesuit only requires people to rehearse the world of
terrorist when we expose Jesuits posting that all non-Catholics must
die!
He will miss death mandates against billions to join the Jack Chick
crew and condemn those who expose it.
>Interesting that you attacked me right off the bat on this subject when I
>was pointing out your factual errors on a completly different subject.
This is a forum for debate, NOT TO BOW TO DAMNED DESPOTS!
This jesuit used artful perversions, so I just had to test him and see
if he is a Jesuit. If he is one, when he hears our expose on people
posting that all non-Catholics must die, HE WILL WASTE MUCH ENERGY
ACCUSING US OF HATRED AND WILL IGNORE THE KILLERS.
>Now
>you whine that I attack you. How hypocritical.
We don't require anyone to rehearse the world of terrorist just when
Jesuits show hatred and issue death mandates. You do because you are
the same and agree with the death mandates.
Here is a point you need to ignore or divert from.
>Keep building the case
>against yourself it makes it easier for me.
Keep proving yourself a Jesuit is better for me!
WHO US FROM THE NEWSGROUPS FROM WHOM YOU REQUIRED A GLOBAL REHEARSAL
OF TERRORISTS OTHER THAN FROM THE ABANDONED JESUITS WE EXPOSE FOR
POSTING THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
Good homework for a damned Jesuit!
>> >You come to these NGs and SCREAM about someone posting that
>> >all non-Catholics must either live or die and you go back and forth
>between
>> >the two slinging outrage about both.
>>
>> I asked the killer...
>>
>> Should non-Catholics live?
>>
>> Or should they die!
>>
>> He has to divert!! How can he notice people posting that billions of
>> people must die JUST FOR NOT BEING CATHOLIC and be sorry WHEN HE
>> AGREES WITH THE MOTION??
>
>I posted your own words which clearly showed you going back and forth.
Listen O damned one and concentrate...
SHOULD NON-CATHOLICS LIVE?
SHOULD NON-CATHOLICS DIE!
Answer the question plainly and leave your Vatican crap back at Rome.
>Go
>ahead and continue to ignore what you wrote yourself, it just shows what
a
>hypocrite you are.
You are a Jesuit. You only spend much time condemning people who
expose your friends telling us all non-Catholics must die.
You know you are a Jesuit and we know it.
I am going to post aside from this sinister super-terrorist in a
moment, but you can see that I gave him some homework!
>> >I find you abhorrent that you scream
>> >outrage at someone who believes that all non-Catholics should live!
>>
>> NEVER SAID THAT! JESUITS WILL BE JESUITS!
>
>Showed it with your own words.
DEAR DAMNED JESUIT...
Is that the way you are going to make discussion? By acting just like
the Inquisitions telling me what I have done and repeating?
Are you going to do the homework I gave you and show us where else you
require that people rehearse the world of terrorist only when Vatican
super-terrorists are exposed posting that all non-Catholics must die?
Dear damned Jesuit...
Must all non-Catholics die?
Must all non-Catholics live!
Why is it so hard to answer plainly and cleanly when human beings have
no such trouble to answer?
>> >You
>> >scream that we should all be outraged because someone said that! You
>scream
>> >outrage about extermination and here you say those who want all people
to
>> >live are evil!
>>
>> NEVER SAID THAT! JESUITS WILL BE JESUITS!
>
>True, you never actually used the word evil but now you are playing
>symantics because your arguement once again falls apart.
I don't prove Jesuit crap by just boldly lying with a few words.
Answer the question besides your claim we must rehearse the world of
terrorists not when we expose Osama, but when we expose others telling
us all non-Catholics must die.
Must non-Catholics live?
Must non-Catholics die?
Tell us by your own words besides the fact you require people to
rehearse the world of terrorists only when Jesuits are exposed posting
on the newsgroups that all non-Catholics must die!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/AppealChapI.htm
>> >You are truly Satan's child!
>>
>> O I'M SO SURPRISED A SUPER-DAMNED JESUIT WHO BELIEVES ALL
>> NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE WOULD THINK SO!
>>
>> >You are obviously evil since
>> >you oppose those who feel non-Catholics should live then you must
really
>be
>> >sup****ting those who feel all other people must die!
>>
>> NEVER SAID THAT! JESUITS WILL BE JESUITS!
>
>Posted your own words to show this.
I don't prove Jesuit crap by just boldly lying with a few words.
Answer the question besides your claim we must rehearse the world of
terrorists not when we expose Osama, but when we expose others telling
us all non-Catholics must die.
Must non-Catholics live?
Must non-Catholics die?
Tell us by your own words besides the fact you require people to
rehearse the world of terrorists only when Jesuits are exposed posting
on the newsgroups that all non-Catholics must die!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/AppealChapI.htm
>> >You are a sup****ter of
>> >genocide on a world wide scale and you think you have the moral
standing
>to
>> >try and berate me and call me names?
>>
>> I exposed people who posted that all non-Catholics must die. I POSTED
>> NOTHING OF THE KIND MYSELF. What is a super-damned Jesuit going to
>> do?
>
>By ignoring all the other hate mongers and only ranting against one group
of
>posters you passively condone their actions and their actions call for
>genocide against non-muslims, blacks, whites, jews, homo***uals,
Americans,
>etc.
This is a Jesuit requirement that the monster doesn't use against
anyone condemning Osama. This is just one of the super-criminal race
Jack Chick tells us has infiltrated everywhere who will attack you
exclusively and only if you expose them posting to us that all
non-Catholics must die.
I have condemned NO ONE to death. His conclusion is that I condone
atrocities similar to his friends BECAUSE I DON'T REHEARSE THE WORLD
OF TERRORISTS ONLY WHEN HIS FRIENDS ARE EXPOSED.
>
>>
>> I have the links where this Jesuit's friend posted that persecution is
>> biblical and all non-Catholics must die. Not a single link exists
>> where I said anything like that about anybody, let alone billions of
>> people.
>
>You keep claiming this was a friend of mine yet I have never heard of
>him/them before and you show no evidence that I have anything to do with
>them.
Why then does this damned Jesuit join so many others to put new and
different rules upon us only when we expose the worst of killers?
>I guess then I should be able to claim with equal authority that you
>are the friend of those who post that all non-muslims should die as well
as
>all blacks, whites, christians, homo***uals, etc.
You mean that since President Bush condemned Osama and not blacks,
whites, Christians, etc. he will suffer Jesuit crap?
WHICH DAMNED JESUIT CANNOT CLAIM ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING, AND DOESN'T
TAKE SUCH LIBERTIES??
I don't prove Jesuit crap by just boldly lying with a few words.
Answer the question besides your claim we must rehearse the world of
terrorists not when we expose Osama, but when we expose others telling
us all non-Catholics must die.
Must non-Catholics live?
Must non-Catholics die?
Tell us by your own words besides the fact you require people to
rehearse the world of terrorists only when Jesuits are exposed posting
on the newsgroups that all non-Catholics must die!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/AppealChapI.htm
>> WHAT IS A SUPER-DAMNED JESUIT GONNA DO!
>>
>> >THAT is possibly the most laughable
>> >thing you have tried to do so far hypocrite. Once again, here are
your
>OWN
>> >WORDS HYPOCRITE:
>>
>> JESUITS WILL BE JESUITS!
>
>:-)
>>
>> >"> >> Should all non-Catholics die?
>> >> >> Should all non-Catholics live?"
>> >
>> >Even if you by some chance suddenly get your act together and stay on
one
>> >side of your own argument you are still a hypocrite.
>>
>> Those are two questions for the Jesuit... How can he answer? If he
>> is truthful you all would probably rush upon him and give him what he
>> would think to do to you if you are not a strict Catholic!
>
>Again, your own words. I only posted those two lines becuse I had posted
>dozens of lines showing your back and forth before that.
I did no back and forth. YOU ARE A DAMNED JESUIT!
Must non-Catholics life? Or must non-Catholics die...
IS IT CHRIST THAT MAKES IT SO HARD FOR "CHRISTIANS" TO ANSWER SUCH A
QUESTION???
>What is a
>hypocrite to do when their arguements are shown to be flawed?
Must non-Catholics live or die, Jesuit!
Are you a hypocrite? or lower, are you a Jesuit!
DO YOU REQUIRE REHEARSALS OF GLOBAL TERRORISTS IF LESSER TERRORISTS
THAN THE ONE I'M EXPOSING ARE EXPOSED?
Damned Jesuit... If people expose or condemn Osama, do you give them
the Jesuit crap you sons of blasphemy do!
>You got it,
>they try to hide what they said themselves and then blame the person who
>pointed it out. You say I sup****t those who would kill all non-Catholics
>yet you have no idea what religion I follow, if any. What religion do
YOU
>follow?
Do we hear on TV atrocities against blacks, muslims, Christians, etc?
Is anything unusual?
DO WE HEAR ON TV PEOPLE POSTING THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE??
How come this damned Jesuit didn't notice a contrast, EXCEPT THAT IF
JESUITS ARE CAUGHT, HE WILL DESPOT TO US THAT WE MUST REHEARSE THE
WORLD OF TERRORISTS OR WE WILL BE EVIL AND WORTH MUCH OF HIS TIME IN
CONDEMNATION.
>
>>
>:-)
>>
>> >You Complain that
>> >someone out there made a post in a Newsgroup that all non-Catholics
must
>die
>> >but you continue to ignore the other groups that call for the death of
>all
>> >non-Muslims for example.
>>
>> Bush attacks Saddam and says nothing about the atrocities in Sudan!
>
>Yep, the hypocrisy continues. Blame eveyrone else in the world for not
>jumping in with both feet for your one particular cause and then try to
show
>that because someone else did something similar it's okay.
Damned Jesuit, did you require Bush to rehearse the world of terrorsts
when he condemned Osama? You mean Bush is very evil and a hypocrite
because he didn't rehearse the world of terrorism? OR IS IT JUST THE
WORST KILLERS AND DECEIVERS ON EARTH THAT ARE EXPOSED WHERE YOUR
JESUIT CRAP MANDATE MUST BE FOLLOWED?
>BTW, Bush has
>said a multitude of things against what is going on in Darfur. Perhaps
you
>remember a visit there by Colin Powell? But that really doesn;t matter
>bnecause now your true bottom line is starting to show. You are nothing
>more than a simple Bush basher. And you can;t even get that right.
Therefore YOU ARE NOT A HYPOCRITE? You are WORSE! You are a Jesuit!
You simply put labels upon me. Where is the proof. Questions in
wait, including, even with Bush, why you think ill of him because he
hasn't rehearsed the world of terrorists when he condemns Osama.
>> >Their calls are not the terrible and deadly
>> >Newsgroup posts, but in the streets with guns and bombs action.
>>
>> Osama claims that Americans must die for the governments involvement
>> in their affairs against Israel. PEOPLE POST THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS
>> MUST DIE FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN THAT THEY ARE NOT CATHOLICS!
>
>The US government's "affairs against Israel"? I thought you were
>complaining that the US government sup****ts Israel, so which is it?
Their (Arabs) affairs against Israel. This is just for the readers.
Jesuits are centuries hopeless.
>Also,
>you are using a terrorist to sup****t your outrage? A man who wants all
>non-muslims to die and who has been directly responsible for the deaths
of
>thousands is your sup****t against some bigotted whack job who posts hate
>speach on the internet but so far you have not blamed for anyone's death
>directly? Your hyopcricy continues to grow to new lows.
THIS IS NOT THE INQUISITIONS YET. You are jumping the gun with despot
hot air outside of proof and discussion.
I don't listen to a damned despot Jesuit!
You heard about Osama's beliefs on the TV? Show us a time when PEOPLE
boldly posted on the internet that all non-Catholics must die, on TV!
One really stands out, but it is highly likely that Jesuits, like the
person who did the post, will not notice.
>> First the Jesuit said we must stay on topic to evade his friends who
>> posted that all non-Catholics must die. Now the Jesuit talks about
>> genocide of non-Muslims.
>
>The topic was 9/11 and your false statements like 3 aircrfat hitting the
>WTC.
You mean the truth that those planes should have had military
accompaniment with your ignoring constantly the question of why you
won't write a book telling the American people that they should not
have expected military protection during 911?
>You were the one who brought up genocide.
This Jesuit then told me I was off topic. Even the subject of the
scope of the death mandates posted, he told us was not to interrupt
the discussion.
Since then, has he been discussing other things?
But a Jesuit who has to follow the lines of others to, with
desperation, ignore the revelation DID NOT RESPOND LIKE A HUMAN BEING.
>I pointed out to you that
>you are being hypocritical because you refuse to acknowledge or condmen
>those who call for the deaths of millions of others, who call for
genocide.
But you're a Jesuit since you only make this rule when we expose
others who believe like you do, that all non-Catholics must die!
DO YOU REQUIRE THE SAME FROM PEOPLE CONDEMNING OSAMA?
>Then you use a terrorist who calls for genocide and world domination by a
>single religious ideal as your example to sup****t your arguements? The
>hyopcrisy would be laughable if it wasn;t so tragically sad.
His friends posted that ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE, and that it was
JUST BUSINESS TO EXTERMINATE THEM!
Something sounds drastically different from what you would commonly
read on TV. But one thing is certain...
Readers, if you saw such, would you use years of Jesuit training to
make sure you ignore it but attack the person who exposes it?
JESUITS ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN DO THAT.
>
>>
>> >Yet you do
>> >not condemn them hypocrite.
>>
>> OSAMA DIDN'T THREATEN ME PERSONALLY! Jesuit did not evenly condemn.
>> He is condemning me viciously telling me I have to condemn the whole
>> bad earth if I think to expose his friends who told us all
>> non-Catholics must die. He has yet to even inquire of me of the
>> people who did this, so he can follow his lie to condemn evenly!
>>
>> Jesuit condemning me and did not condemn the people who posted that
>> all non-Catholics must die.
>
>Wrong again hypocrite. Just because you cut my words out of a post does
not
>mean they weren't printed.
But Jesuit I asked if non-Catholics must live or if non-Catholics must
die and you cut my words telling me I condone the deaths of
non-Catholics because I'm waffling, when I'm not, but asking a
question. When I show you people who plainly said they condoned the
deaths of billions of people, you just dismissed them with a few
words?
Tell us... ARE THE INQUISITIONS BACK??
>I specifically said I am against ANYONE who
>calls for death of ANY group based on their race, religion, color, ***ual
>orientation, etc.
I said so too, but are you using mental reservation?
Bush told the world that he unequivocally does not sup****t torture.
He then, at another time, tells us he has a different non-American
Standard definition of the word. He says torture is when someone is
badly hurt causing death or organ damage.
You use mental reservation? We already had to time you by the
calendar to even give your statements. Since then, YOU HAVE USED
EVERY TRICK NOT TO EXCUSE OTHER TERRORISTS LIKE OSAMA, BUT Y9OU TELL
US WE HAVE TO FOLLOW CERTAIN RULES WHEN WE EXPOSE THE WORST TERRORISTS
OF ALL FOR CENTURIES SO!
>You have yet to condemn anyone except a small group of
>internet bigots.
What would a Jesuit then do? This one winds up condemning everyone
else BUT? He gives special rules only when these terrorists are
exposed?
We asked him to show us when he gave others the advice that when they
condemn terrorists, they have to condemn the world of terrorists or
will be evil.
>You have yet to say a single thing against those who kill
>thousands of innocent's including those of their own group.
YOU DON'T REQUIRE OTHERS TO FOLLOW THESE DESPOT RULES WHEN THEY
CONDEMN ANY OTHER TERRORISTS, WHICH ARE IN FACT NOT AS BAD!
>You continue to
>show you find a post on the internet to be more abhorent to you than the
>actual killing of innocent people. You are such a hypocrite.
Jesuit, tell us about the authorities who arrested a man for making a
joke about a bomb at an air****t. When did this man actually detonate
a bomb and kill people?
I'm being attacked by this no-conscience damned Jesuit, and he didn't
rehearse a list of other criminals that makes him use so much of his
intensity and emotional hate! Did I kill anyone? Or am I trying to
stop killings.
>Actually,
>based on the way you use the word Jesuit, I think your definition of that
>term actually might just fit YOU to a tee.
Which Jesuit would see differently?
I see people posting that all non-Catholics must die. I'm upset AT
THE PERSON WHO EXPOSE IT?
Get the polls of all the Americans who become jesuits just because I
say so, and also just because they will do everything to protect
people who post that all non-Catholics must die!
Didn't hear the like on television of any do***ented terrorists, yet
this Jesuit cannot notice something contrasting!
HE MUST BE AGAINST ABORTION!
In His Grace,
Susan
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
|
