On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:13:39 -0500, Thumper <jaylsmithXYZ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:04:42 -0600, "Rich"
><oldsarge(nospam)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>"Perry" <perry@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:3tubu0p37tkbc38224jtn2eqvn933ehmu9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:20:42 -0600, "Rich"
>>> <oldsarge(nospam)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Need I say more?
>>>>
>>>>I just had to spout off with the news the search is over and it has
been
>>>>concluded there never was any WMD since Gulf War I.
>>>>
>>>>But then I guess the war isn't about WMD anymore is it?
>>>>
>>> They didn't say there never was any WMD since the first Gulf War, just
>>> that they couldn't find it, big difference. They also said it may have
>>> been moved to Syria.
>>
>>Well since Syria has been a pain in the ass, why not just walk in and
start
>>looking around there?
>
>There is absolutely no evidence that any WMDs were moved to Iraq.
>That was just another Bush mis-direction. They not only didn't find
>WMDs, they didn't find any evidence that any existed much past the
>first Iraq war.
>Thumper
It's the fifth column:
Confuse America before you take it over! But military servicemen
would protect us and prevent our country from being besieged. Part of
the reason the Iraqi war was started, WAS TO KILL THOSE MILITARY
SERVICEMEN WHO WOULD HELP US!
In His Grace,
Susan
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
|
