On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:51:23 +0100, Derek Moody
<derek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>In article <WZSdnc92kbLJTb_VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Pat Gardiner
><URL:mailto:patgardiner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> "Derek Moody" <derek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:ant08095006cBxcK@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <t7qd****IDua3Ib_VnZ2dnUVZ8vCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Pat Gardiner
>> > <URL:mailto:patgardiner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> >> Those innocent halcyon days have long gone. Britain is a hell-hole
of
>> >> human
>> >> disease, much of which is obviously coming from sick livestock and
which
>> >> is
>> >> being covered up and talked down by a corrupt government veterinary
>> >> service.
>> >
>> > Er, No, no and no. You speak as if hankering for the healthy,
halcyon
>> > days
>> > of Scutari.
>>
>> Yes and yes,
>
>It really isn't you know. We're a lot healthier and better cared for
than we
>were on our youth.
>
> BBC's Panorama seems to be on my side as far as the seriousness
>> of the human health situation is concerned - and I have had the most
senior
>> of the government vets in my drawing room.
>
>Any media outlet is always going to be looking for the most melodramatic
>option available. I don't suppose TV re****ters are any better than their
>print counterparts.
>
>> I gave evidence to a select committee in 2000 and OLAF, the serious
fraud
>> squad of the EU.
>>
>> I rather think I have more credibility than you.
>
>You might have had, once upon a time.
>
>> >
>> >> It will probably take decades to unravel the damage anyway.
>> >
>> > Not if you stop now.
>>
>> Whistlebowers always attract this charge from those anxious that the
abuse
>> should continue. It is a dangerous charge to make as it draws attention
to
>
>What about one-string harpists?
>
>> But it is nice to see recognition that I am having an impact. Thank
you.
>
>The only impact is to clog a one useful newsgroup with impenetrable,
>irrelevant and probably stolen drivel.
>
>> >> Plan to feed pigs to chickens slammed
>> >>
>> >> May 8 2008 by Sam Wood, The Journal
>> >
>> > You -have- secured copyright for this I presumy?
>>
>> Oh I don't think many journals will want to make that charge merely
because
>
>So you haven't acquired reproduction rights. You are trying to impress
with
>stolen text.
Nice one Pat you have the prick rattled. He's understandably upset as
he lost a recent court case.
|
