Patrick Keenan wrote:
>"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:5oWdnSffrpDoibvVnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>sdgreen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Anarchore" <e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:k5mdnSoJvZORU7jVnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>s...
>>>>THE END OF ZOG IS COMING
>>>>
>>>
>>>Patrick Grimm is a total idiot whose assumptions are completely
>>>incorrect and off the wall.
>>
>>But if that were true why would Jews need to silence people like him
>>with laws?
>
>"Jews" don't need to. People do, because lies can do real harm.
The laws are not there to be used against lies, they are there against
those telling the truth.
>
>As a recent and devastating example, consider the clearly visible
>effect of officially-sup****ted hate speech directed against a large
>segment of the Rwandan population, which led directly to the murder
>of over 800,000 people in about 100 days.
Right, so free speech = government funded hate? You can't say there
was free speech in that country, and of course that is part of the
problem in African countries like Zimbabwe.
>
>This isn't a game. People die. Smarten up.
Is one million people, that's 1,000,000 formerly living breathing
loving human beings killed in Iraq enough for you? Your ignorance and
self righteous attitude are a foul combination.
Smarten up, and know who your real enemies are. The neocons are
Israel-first Zionists, doing the bloody deeds for Israel, and to fatten
their own pockets.
>
>You might find the film "Shooting Dogs" to be helpful. In any case,
>if you really are this ignorant of the effects of hate speech, you
>should get some education about what happened in Rwanda, and how the
>murders were implemented. There's lots of material available,
>including current trial transcripts.
>
>Your question also ignores the long existence of libel and slander
>laws, which exist in most societies.
>
>And finally, your question also ignores other social efforts at
>censor****p - is it because Jews aren't involved? Consider the death
>sentence issued to silence a man because he agreed publicly that
>Mohammed's parents might not logically be Muslims, because they were
>both dead before the Revelations. Are you going to say that this,
>too, is the fault of the Jews?
I don't care what Muslims do in their own countries. If they start
taking over government and declaring wars under false pretense I will
oppose that as well!
>
>*Please* try to think these things through.
>
>Hope this helps.
>-pk
Same to you!
|
