In article <1air24tg4ee5q2p7clkscp1au73jl18f18@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Old Codger
<URL:mailto:oldcodger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
( Not the real Old Codger, Pete the Troll is forging headers.)
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:15:58 +0100, Derek Moody
> <derek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >In article <dugq2419g2lisuskngk0bj3v2t6gu3grrq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Old Codger
> ><URL:mailto:oldcodger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >( Not the real Old Codger, Pete the Troll is forging headers.)
> >
> >> On Fri, 16 May 2008 09:04:17 +0100, Derek Moody
> >> <derek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <vdoo24tuhhf28jr9v7mfultjd886jrf4et@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Old Codger
> >> ><URL:mailto:oldcodger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > ( Not the real Old Codger, Pete the Troll is forging headers.)
> >> >
> >> >Pete,
> >> >
> >> >> Don't listen to moody Moody he's just spent sixteen hours adrift
in
> >> >> his charter wreck with yet another engine breakdown. Still I
s'pose it
> >> >
> >> >Please tell us where you read the re****ts of my nautical
misadventures.
> >>
> >> From the victims who were stupid enough to charter you!
> >>
> >> >Perhaps you would be so kind as to share the url's of the CG, RNLI
and
> >> >Admiralty re****ts?
> >>
> >> 27 breakdowns in three years and four rescues due to incompetence and
> >
> >So that's 27 RNLI shout-re****t URLs
>
> Even you are not stupid enough to call them out any more. Which
Go-on, not even one or two URL's?
> >- clearly you wouldn't trust -me-
> >to list them, perhaps you had better do so?
>
> Like your criminal record the information is not available due to data
But the court re****ts are a matter of public record. They're meat and
drink
to the regional press. I dare say you have the URL's logged?
> protection legislation. Especially as two of the most recent events
> have resulted in your prosecution for A: RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING
> ANOTHER PERSON. (Loss or Destruction of a Vessel). B: RECKLESSLY
> ENDANGERING ANOTHER VESSEL. (Loss or Destruction of a Vessel). And
> it's not the first time you have been found guilty and in one case the
> wreck, sorry, vessel was confiscated and destroyed.
So those will be in the Admiralty Court's index of cases. Perhaps you
could
point it out?
> Not to be confused with your pathetic attempts at optional rescue
> services disclosures to promote the rescue services. I doubt rescuing
> a dirty old man on a wreck with 16 gnomes prepared to pay charter fees
> is headline news especially when you failed to get 1km off the coast!
It must have been for you to hear of it. I'm sure everyone would love to
see the original re****t - you do have the url for that one at least?
Cheerio,
--
>> derek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://www.farm-direct.co.uk/
|
