fargo116 wrote:
> On May 19, 10:25 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >On May 19, 6:55 am, VRWC Destruction Machine <Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >wrote:
> > >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
> >
> > >> >On May 17, 1:23 pm, VRWC Destruction Machine
> > >> ><Right...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> >> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> > >> >> crayon...
> >
> > >> >> >VRWC Destruction Machine wrote:
> > >> >> >> fargo116 <fargo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in crayon...
> >
> > >> >> >>>On May 15, 11:31 am, The Pope Wears Prada
> > >> >> >>><The_Pope@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> >> >>>> Winston Smith, American Patriot wrote:
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > What does America think about? God, gays, and guns.
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > This ruling of the court is going to hurt Obama for
> > >> >> >>>> > November.
> >
> > >> >> >>>> How will this ruling by a *conservative* California
> > >> >> >>>> Supreme Court possibly hurt Obama in November?
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > Too many Americans still believe that homo***uality is
> > >> >> >>>> > a chosen rather
> > >> >> >>>> > than innate/instinctive behavior, and thus subject to
> > >> >> >>>> > moral judgment.
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > McCain will express indignation, maybe outrage, at the
> > >> >> >>>> > court's decision, while Obama will applaud it or at
> > >> >> >>>> > least remain silent about it. It's your call.
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > ============
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> > >> >> >>>> > Published: May 15, 2008
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The California Supreme Court has
> > >> >> >>>> > overturned a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for
> > >> >> >>>> > California to become the second state where gay and
> > >> >> >>>> > lesbian residents can marry.
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday,
> > >> >> >>>> > saying that domestic partner****ps are not a good
> > >> >> >>>> > enough substitute for marriage in an opinion written
> > >> >> >>>> > by Chief Justice Ron George.
> >
> > >> >> >>>> > The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco,
> > >> >> >>>> > two dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California
> > >> >> >>>> > and another gay rights group in March 2004 after the
> > >> >> >>>> > court halted San Francisco's monthlong same-***
> > >> >> >>>> > wedding march that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom's
> > >> >> >>>> > direction.
> >
> > >> >> >>>>
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-CA-GayMarriage.html-Hide
> > >> >> >>>> >quoted text -
> >
> > >> >> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >
> > >> >> >>>Winston, nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals
> > >> >> >>>marrying except maybe the Crazies in the South who are
> > >> >> >>>going to be too busy sitting on their hands to vote for
> > >> >> >>>Gramps. They are more concerned about losing their house,
> > >> >> >>>losing their job, affortding a tank of gas and affording
> > >> >> >>>to go to the doctor right about now. Never mind thousands
> > >> >> >>>of their kids getting killed and more than half a trillion
> > >> >> >>>dollars of their money thrown away.
> >
> > >> >> >>>S. Olson
> >
> > >> >> >> Oh. Does 60% of the electorate live in the South?
> >
> > >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
> >
> > >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
> >
> > >> >> >> Is California part
> > >> >> >> of the South?
> >
> > >> >> >Uh, no. Why do you ask?
> >
> > >> >> Did you read the post I was responding to?
> >
> > >> >> >> 62% of Californian voters voted against homo***ual
> > >> >> >> marriages.
> >
> > >> >> >62% of California voters were just told that they have no
> > >> >> >right to deny homo***uals the right to marry.
> >
> > >> >> By four judges. Judicial activism is at work.
> >
> > >> >> >> What does queer nuptials have to do with gas, jobs, homes,
> > >> >> >> health insurance or the Iraq War?
> >
> > >> >> >Fargo already told you. There are people in this country,
> > >> >> >primarily in the South, who consider same *** marriage to
> > >> >> >threaten their well being more than gas prices, job losses,
> > >> >> >home losses, the absence of health insurance, and the Iraq
> > >> >> >war.
> >
> > >> >> That why I responded to Fargo with his inane post. He didn't
> > >> >> respond and your response lacks substance.
> >
> > >> >You really didn't 'respond' WC. Except maybe to pretend you're
> > >> >a fool because there seems to be this weird idea going around
> > >> >in connie circles that pretending to be stupid makes you look
> > >> >smart.
> >
> > >> >Newsflash: It just makes you look stupid.
> >
> > >> >S. Olson
> >
> > >> Your comment I was responding to was idiotic.
> >
> > >> >>nobody really gives a damn about homo***uals marrying except
> > >> >>maybe the Crazies in the South
> >
> > >> That line was just stupid. I asked if California was in the South
> > >> because 62% of the voters voted against homo***ual marriages.
> > >> What's wrong do you have short term memory loss that you don't
> > >> remember what you wrote?
> >
> > >Give us a break, WC. We all know you wrote it because you think
> > >pretending to be stupid makes you look smart, a weird freaking
> > >notion the connies have adopted because they pretend not to
> > >understand irony. At least for all out sakes I HOPE they are
> > >pretending.
> >
> > >For example, how come you never point out that that 62% figure was
> > >before the collapse of the housing market, before we lost more than
> > >4,000 kids in Iraq, before the Drunken Frat Boy wasted more than
> > >half a trillion bucks in the wrong country and before we went into
> > >a recession?
> >
> > >> Health care and the war in Iraq has nothing to do queers getting
> > >> married.
> >
> > >Only in that more people care about such things than people who
> > >care about homo***uals getting married. They simply do. You wanna
> > >ride such a platform, go ahead. See how many GOP cocksuckers
> > >outside of the South it gets elected.
> >
> > >It always amazes me how GOP cocksuckers can scream "leave us
> > >alone," on one hand and decree which consenting adults can get
> > >married on the other. Typical.
> >
> > >S. Olson
> >
> > Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has been that way since
> > the beginning of history. What makes faggots so special that makes
> > them think they can change years of tradition? Why must we be a
> > civilization of deviants?
>
> Whatever happened to the connie motto: "leave us alone?" You aren't
> one of those connies who got ****ed in the ass years ago and has hated
> himself for decades because he secretly enjoyed it, are you?
>
>
> S. Olson
The connies have never really believed in that "leave us alone" ****.
What
they really want is an authoritarian government that dictates the societal
mores that they find acceptable while outlawing all that they find
unacceptable. Connies want to outlaw flag burning, abortion, the teaching
of evolution, *** education, and a plethora of other symbols of freedom
and
enlightenment while simultaneously injecting their God, their mythology,
and
their political dogma into every aspect of American life. This VRWC
deviant
is a prime example of one of them.
|
