Tom Potter wrote:
(snip)
> I am surprised to see that "Buck Mulligan"
> is unaware that HTML do***ents can be printed
> and converted into "books",
PDF might make a reasonable book, but HTML usually
doesn't come out well. A "book" is often many web
pages, each of which should be multiple book pages,
but without good page breaks. Figures, for example,
might cross what should be page boundaries.
HTML makes better scrolls than books.
-- glen


|