On Jul 23, 2:42 pm, z <z...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> znuybv <thowil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
innews:be8c3e39-4d58-4604-a690-8b4993ed3ab1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2:21 pm, z <z...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> znuybv <thowil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>
innews:824b437e-d0a2-4d84-acc2-dd2555e1f9d7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> m:
>
> >> > On Jul 23, 1:44 pm, z <z...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> znuybv <thowil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >> >>
innews:235abfb2-f91d-4a7f-b988-0b561a2ab8e4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> s.c om:
>
> >> >> > On Jul 23, 1:27 pm, mordacpreven...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> >> On Jul 23, 1:14 pm, nj <calcio1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > You rarely see an interview couch such hopeless inanity in
> >> >> >> > the pretense of not getting an answer to the question, but,
> >> >> >> > what can I say? Couric's a whiz at this. You see the problems
> >> >> >> > coming a mile away when Couric frames the discussion as a
> >> >> >> > response to people "scratching their heads," people "asking
> >> >> >> > why," and people whose "eyebrows" are raised.
>
> >> >> >> > Such people, of course, do not exist and cannot be named.
>
> >> >> >> > 'Tis the beginning of a Straw Man argument, which has sadly
> >> >> >> > become the first resort of many in the press.
>
> >> >> >> > From there, the line of interrogation is rivetingly
> >> >> >> > unconcerned with substantive analysis of Obama's Iraq War
> >> >> >> > position - it's a silly little trap of false logic, in which
> >> >> >> > Couric attempts to get Obama to admit to the obvious - that
> >> >> >> > 100,000+ troops in Iraq have affected the conditions in the
> >> >> >> > country, and hang a false admission of "Surge" efficicacy
> >> >> >> > around his neck.
>
> >> >> >> > When are you ****ers ever going to learn who the media really
> >> >> >> > works for?
>
> >> >> >>
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/23/katie-couric-to-obama-
> >> >> >> >peo _n_ ...
>
> >> >> >> CBS edited an interview Curic had with McSame so that he
> >> >> >> wouldn't look like an idiot when he gave an incomprehensible
> >> >> >> answer to a simple question.
>
> >> >> > When Obama was asked whether or not he wanted our country to win
> >> >> > in Iraq; he refused to answer yes or no.
>
> >> >> Thats because its a nonsense question. We've already 'won' the
> >> >> war ..
>
> >> > Good. Now tell that to the Black Surrender Monkey.
>
> >> Can you win an occupation?
>
> > Yes.
>
> So that should have been the question.
No.


|