On Jul 24, 4:51=A0pm, Jerry Kraus <jkraus_1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 12:58=A0pm, David Johnston <da...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:40:30 -0700, Major Debacle
>
> > <Major_Debacle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >Nine Republicans broke ranks to vote with 229 Democrats to send a
sing=
le
> > >article of impeachment against George W Bush to the House Judiciary
> > >Committee for hearings. No Democrat voted against the resolution.
>
> > Ooh. =A0They're going to have...hearings. =A0
>
> David, you're correct that they know they can't get a conviction in
> the Senate against Bush. =A0Too many Republicans. =A0That situation will
> be rectified in November, but Bush will be out of power in January.
> What they're likely to do is impeach him in the House, but no have no
> trial. =A0 Then, next year, with a Democratic President and a much more
> heavily Democratic Congress, they will have private citizen George
> Bush investigated by an independant counsel. =A0He could end up getting
> charged with violating the U.S. Constitution, and sent to prison in
> the U.S. =A0Or, he could be sent to Europe for prosecution for War
> Crimes. =A0 As for your "pleaaaaaaaaaaaaasse, that WON'T HAPPEN", do you
> remember Vice President Spiro Agnew? =A0He did two years in Federal
> Prison for felony obstruction of Justice. =A0Bush is a lot like Agnew.
> An arrogant big mouth who's way out of his depth. =A0They could well
> make a scapegoat out of him.
and isn't (wasn't, don't know if he is still kickin or not, or died of
the "hatred cancer" that tony snow did, and most republicans
eventually do) a republiKKKKan?
|
