Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > George Bush > Re: The (Suprem...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 34 Topic 407231 of 431702
Post > Topic >>

Re: The (Supremely Ironic) Pelosi Partial Meltdown

by Major Debacle <Major_Debacle@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 24, 2008 at 08:00 PM

Rock Brentwood wrote:
> On Jul 24, 12:40 pm, Major Debacle <Major_Debacle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> Nine Republicans broke ranks to vote with 229 Democrats to send a
single
>> article of impeachment against George W Bush to the House Judiciary
>> Committee for hearings. No Democrat voted against the resolution.
> 
> One of the Cable Mutants (Riley) had a body language analyst on to
> discuss what was going on in Pelosi's mind when she started melting
> down. Like with most things, she was way off on a lot, and missed a
> lot.
> 
> Body language, in fact, is not a matter of "interpretation". For one,
> it's the primary means of communication between animals and humans
> (properly trained to pick up and send the appropriate signals). The
> focal point is what people who work as interviewers and interrogators
> refer to as micro-expressions.
> 
> These I can see clearly, as much as if you were to express the
> thoughts out loud. In some cases, the person expressing them isn't
> even able to get it out any other way -- essentially a bottleneck.
> 
> Pelosi was, in fact, in such a bottleneck. There were several things
> she wanted to get out, and it all started coming out in a log-jam.
> 
> Number one. The excessive hand-waving, like the Emperor flailing at
> the last minute after he had been thrown into the nuclear generator in
> the 1983 Star Wars movie, is a gesture of helpless exasperation.
> Incredibly, she was actually also nervous! She's got stage fright!
> 
> I've seen that with several other politicians. They can be at the
> highest tiers in government, but once you get them in front of people
> or a camera, they simply unravel. The most prominent example, in fact,
> is president Bush, who shows a great deal of stage fright whenever he
> goes extem****aneous.
> 
> But she was also pissed off about a couple things (which exacerbated
> the nervousness).
> 
> Number one, the head shaking like steam is coming out of it and like
> the whole thing is about to go nuclear -- the thought underlying this
> is "get these buffoons out of office, clean out #1 and #2, and clear
> the way for #3 to get in there RIGHT NOW and execute responsible
> government (for a change)."
> 
> Number two, "President Bush is a LOSER who has no credibility", what
> was left unsaid, "and we in Congress with an approval rating only HALF
> that of the President are getting pinned for his incompetence. And now
> everybody's blaming us for the fact that we can't get a damned thing
> done, because with our short-of-60 majority it's either the Bush way
> or the High Way."
> 
> In other words, "the Buck stops with the President, not with us and
> our 10-15% approval rating making us look like EVEN WORSE losers than
> the President."
> 
> Number three, was the anticipatory defensiveness, just waiting for
> someone to point out to her that the body she leads has only half the
> approval rating of the President ... just waiting for an excuse to
> bite off anyone's head who even so much as brings that up.
> 
> Four, she got red-faced over her own incompetence -- which was what
> led to the incisive retribution against someone with twice the
> approval rating than the people she leads. Adding insult to injury was
> her knowledge that she was going to have to stuff the whole
> impeachment process into "committee". In other words, the President
> basically made Pelosi his *****. What she heard is "I'm going to do
> whatever the hell I want, and you're going to get on your knees,
> wor****p me and show me how much you like it, Mme. Speaker. I'm going
> to drive the nation to ruin and it's all going to be deemed your
> fault. Thus, the completion of the Three Directives: Find 'Em, ****
> 'Em and Forget 'Em."


Could you rephrase that in 25 words or less?

I read a few lines and what you wrote really doesn't seem worth reading.

-- 
Output from Prudhoe Bay peaked in 1998 at 2 million barrels per day. 
Today, less than 700,000 barrels a day are being pumped south.

Total production from 1977 through 2005 was 13 billion barrels. As of 
August 2006, BP estimated that only 2 billion recoverable barrels remain.

Prudhoe Bay is running dry.
 




 34 Posts in Topic:
House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article against B
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-07-24 10:40:30 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
David Johnston <david@  2008-07-24 17:58:53 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-07-24 11:14:08 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
A Veteran <georgewkspa  2008-07-24 11:26:32 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
David Johnston <david@  2008-07-24 20:10:17 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
"Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-24 14:49:13 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
David Johnston <david@  2008-07-24 20:10:57 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
"Jim E" <M1T  2008-07-24 17:23:16 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
David Johnston <david@  2008-07-27 00:40:20 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
Jerry Kraus <jkraus_19  2008-07-24 13:51:04 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
timeOday <timeOday-UNS  2008-07-24 18:19:00 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
"Jim E" <M1T  2008-07-24 17:28:30 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
David Johnston <david@  2008-07-30 01:34:50 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
triba_la_raza@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 14:11:18 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
"Jim E" <M1T  2008-07-24 17:18:38 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
astroncer@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-24 20:44:06 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
awthrawthr@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-24 11:11:17 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-07-24 11:15:53 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
"Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-24 14:53:17 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
"Wayne H. Wilhelm&qu  2008-07-24 15:14:30 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
triba_la_raza@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 14:12:15 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
triba_la_raza@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 14:13:42 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
triba_la_raza@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-24 14:15:25 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
Igor <thoovler@[EMAIL   2008-07-24 19:13:03 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
"Adam Whyte-Settlar&  2008-07-25 21:12:58 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
bw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bl  2008-07-24 21:09:48 
The (Supremely Ironic) Pelosi Partial Meltdown (was: House votes
Rock Brentwood <markwh  2008-07-24 17:36:29 
Re: The (Supremely Ironic) Pelosi Partial Meltdown
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-07-24 20:00:00 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-24 18:17:29 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-07-24 18:26:09 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-24 18:59:00 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
Major Debacle <Major_D  2008-07-24 20:01:05 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
astroncer@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-24 20:58:16 
Re: House votes 238 to 180 to consider impeachment article again
David Johnston <david@  2008-07-30 01:42:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 0:45:16 CST 2008.