Re: Why can't Obama admit the obvious? The surge worked

On Jul 25, 1:29=A0pm, Coffee in Madrid <gde...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <484787a0-0d0f-4500-9a09-2439826dc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> =A0HughJorgan <BurtonU...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Jul 24, 1:28=A0pm, goatman <gene...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > =A0Smart enough to say/do ANYTHING to get elected as per his
"spiritu=
al
>
> > > > mentor and confidant for 20 years" Rev. Wright.
>
> > > You sound jealous.
>
> > You mistake honesty for jealousy only because I'm talking down about
> > your nigga.
>
> Why should Obama admit anything? The war was flawed and should never of
> have happened.
>
> The "surge" is nothing more than a lull in violence due to money being
> thrown at them, that they don't have time to fight an insurgency cuz
> they're too busy counting all them american wads of cash.
>
> Coffee in moneyBag-dad

That's right: Obama and the Dems were fully invested in seeing the
surge - and Iraq itself - fail. That would have bestowed maximum
political benefit for the Dems. No wonder they can't give full credit
to the policy and McCain's singularly brave determination to back it
when it was very unpopular, and at the possible expense of the demise
of his Presidential candidacy. remember, he was really down and out
for a while last year. That's called political courage and McCain
showed it big time. In spades, as it were.