On May 8, 3:52 pm, Nick...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 07:31:43 -0700 (PDT),Thundercleets
>
> <thundercle...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> She's got 95% of the delegats that Obama does
>
> >No,
>
> >The only way Hillory can win is if the Democrats go the political
> >insider path and allow the "super-delegates" to decide the election.
> >She is behind in both the popular vote and in "regular" delegates.
>
> If Obama has won---why all the fuss?
>
> Truth is, that he instigated a call for her to quit
No, get the spin right, Hillary already offered to generously allow
him to run as her vice prez.
> Truth is that the margin is about 2-3% between
> them---so why doesn't HE quit?
Why would Obama quit when he is winning?
He's not Gore after all.
> If it takes "super-delegates"---so ****ing what?
Because why waste all of the time, effort and money when the candidate
is going to be decided in the back room by a bunch of party bosses and
power broker lobbyists
> Don't you finally want a president that can kick the
> living **** out of anyone who crosses their path?
Who Hillary? She is a political chameleon.
If it suits her, she can change her tune on a buck.
I'm surprised she hasn't had herself filmed shooting some ducks or
some middle class folks in a matching hunter orange ensemble.
> THe BIGGEST enemy we have in the world today is
> conservatives and their chicken**** racist, homophobic,
> greed and lying.
>
> >==============================================
> >From the beginning of the Democratic party, through the civil war and
the New Deal,
> > the South was the foundation stone of the party's national strength.
With the coming
> >of the civil-rights revolution, Democratic presidents Kennedy and
Johnson deployed the
> > federal government to sup****t social equality. In reaction,
Republicans - from Goldwater
> >to Nixon to Reagan - developed a Southern strategy to win over white
voters in the
> >region who felt betrayed. That strategy involved using widely
understood code going
> >back to the civil war - phrases like "states' rights", used to justify
slavery - in an
> >updating of the well-worn strategy of invoking race to keep poor white
and black
> >Americans divided on issues of common interest. Thus the party of
Lincoln
> >became the party of Reagan.
|
