On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:33:53 -0600, Ken
<ken@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> in 1996 about her work for Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99
> occasions that she was unable to recall what she might have done."
> Could that have been an example of perjury???? America wants to
> know.
No, that's not an example of "perjury", KENLOON
> Again I am sorry, for I thought telling a lie while under oath was
> perjury?
>> Sorry, still does'nt qualify as "perjury", KENLOON
>Listed below is what YourDictionary.com says. If you disagree with my
> definition, just what is YOUR defintion????
>> Perjury is the "willful and corrupt taking of a false
>> oath in regard to a material matter in a judicial
>> proceeding". It is sometimes called "lying under oath";
>> that is, deliberately telling a lie in a courtroom
>> proceeding after having taken an oath to tell the
>> truth.
Now then, KENLOON---LISTEN UP AGAIN ! !
>>
>> 1) The "lie" in a CIVIL case of Jones v Clinton was
>> NOT (repeat not) "material to her case".
>>
>> 2) the Denial of "***ual relations": a) bore no bearing
>> on Jones's Case, b) was in response to a NON-LEGAL
>> definition concocted by Jones Attorneys and Clinton
>> made the denial believing he was correct.
>>
>> 3) The "Denial" was pointedly in reference to a
>> NON-LEGAL definition of "***ual relations" (offered by
>> Jones attorneys)---Judge Wright explaining that Clinton
>> "Had a right" to make that denial
>>
>> 4) Was a "RIGHT" accorded Clinton (to deny) after Jones
>> was warned that he (clinton) had a LEGAL RIGHT to
>> challenge a NEW definition of "***ual relations" in a
>> court of law.
>>
>> OTOH, Reagan KNEW that North, etal, was selling arms to
>> Iran, Knew that the operation was underway, Aided and
>> abetted the subversion of constitutional government by
>> withholding (lying in congressional testimony by his
>> staff) and later ADMITTED knowing it was happening. He
>> "Forgot" he knew all those things---until they were
>> caught---at which time he went on TV and acknowledege
>> HE DID KNOW.
>
>Dear Click,
>
> I hope for your sake that the free medical care that the Democrats want
>p*****, because you are apparently suffering from Attention Deficit
>Disorder. I was talking about Hillary when I said:
WRONG AGAIN, KENLOON ! ! !
You were talking about "Principles", "lying" and
"perjury" as it "RELATES" to Hillary, and/or the
CLintons.
I merely pointed out to you that if you claim
opposition candidate isn't "worthy", "trustworthy",
"moral" or (is) "immoral"---THEN we MUST look to YOUR
perception of said "principle" to ascertain whether you
have a valid complaint----OR (as I've proven) merely a
****ing bit of hypocritical nonsense. (which you
decidedly have)
> "I am sorry, I had forgotten that she experienced shell shock in
>Bosnia and is still suffering from it. Of course that was after "she
>testified in 1996 about her work for Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99
>occasions that she was unable to recall what she might have done."
>Could that have been an example of perjury???? America wants to know."
And the explanation to you was:
a) Whether or not she "forgot" isn't relevant to the
issue because "lying" by YOUR chosen politicians FAR
EXCEEDS the gravity and egregiousness of the Clintons
b) The "INFERENCE" that "something" was amiss in her
"99 answers" vis-a-vis Whitewater, contains NO (repeat
NO) corroborating evidence to sup****t a claim she
lied---that only YOUR willingness to accept "innuendo,
conjecture, or unproven allegations" as "Fact" is basis
enough to call you a chicken****, idiot and
mush-brained dolt willing to subvert your "principles"
to make you feel better about your stupdiit y.
> Why you feel it necessary to change the subject, leave out a question
>that was in reply to one of your points,
The issue is PRINCIPLES, KenLoon.
We MUST know YOUR definition of "moral", "honest" and
"ethical" in order to ascertain whether you're merely
accepting false allegations as fact when it's a person
of adverse political persuasion----but all the while
accepting LIES, EVASION, SUBVERSION, SUBORNING and
PERJURY in your own politicians when it suits you
I proved that the latter is the case---making you the
laughing stock you are worse than before.
>
> Lastly you seem to enjoy the episode where "Slick" took out his *****
>and asked a resident of Arkansas to kiss it.
By "resident" do you mean Lewinsky?
Consider:
a) It was none of your business who or why someone
kisses his dick whether asked for or not
b) It was a sad state of affairs that your political
party took it upon themselves to use that to "punish" a
president they could not beat
c) That it speaks of the hypocrisy of your political
ideology and politicians when THEY lied more, committed
inimical acts against the constitution for political
gain, and;
d) Speaks of your ignorance and stupidity by trying to
divert, or limit the issue to the Clintons and not have
to speak of your OWN politicians lying, perjury,
pedophilia, and "toe-tapping
>==================================================================
>President Reagan created the conditions which made possible the crimes
>committed by others by his secret deviations from announced national
>policy as to Iran and hostages and by his open determination to keep
>the contras together ``body and soul'' despite a statutory ban on
contra aid.1
> McFarlane, North Trial Testimony, 3/10/89, p. 3946
..
|
