Re: KENLOON ADMITS "REAGAN A REALLY, REALLY BIG LIAR" (and perjurer) but says "well, it's what we had so we love him anyway"

On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:44:31 -0600, Ken
<ken@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>>> Listed below is what YourDictionary.com says.  If you disagree with my
>>> definition, just what is YOUR defintion????
>> 
>> The Model Penal Code, which has been adopted in some form by many
states 
>> and promulgated by the Commission on Uniform State Laws, also sets
forth 
>> the following basic elements for the crime of perjury: (1) a false 
>> statement is made under oath or equivalent affirmation during a
judicial 
>> proceeding; (2) the statement must be material or relevant to the 
>> proceeding; and (3) the witness must have the Specific Intent to
deceive.
>> 
>> 
>	I don't see any real conflict between our definitions.

Your definition does not specify what conditions the
"lie" must be uttered (even under oath)

Are you incapable of looking up the congressionally
defined definition of "perjury" in the US CODE?

> Hillary was 
>being questioned about fraud in a case where she was a material person. 

Post ANY/ALL evidence here that sup****ts a claim she
lied.

>  If she did not answer truthfully the questions while she was under 
>oath, she was committing perjury.  

"IF"????

Are you stupid, KEN?

You can only claim she "lied" or "committed perjury" if
PROOF exists she did.

You're ALLEGING----without ANY proof.

What an UNAMERICAN thing to do, KENLOON.

>Any person who answered 96 questions 
>with "I cannot recall" truthfully, in a case such as the one she was 
>involved, is not qualified to be president on that basis alone.  I rest 
>my case.

So, RONNIE RAYGUN was not qualified and should have
been removed?

Why haven't you posted that in a statement, KENLOON?

He said "I don't recall" over 144 times in his
Pointdexter deposition---Grand Jury testimony---UNDER
OATH------then when caught ADMITTED IT.

>====================================================================
>
>In the case of the two 1985 Israeli arms transfers, President Reagan 
>knew from the outset that he was acting in conflict with his own 
>announced policies of not rewarding hostage takers and of not selling 
>arms to nations sponsoring terrorism. He knew this activity was 
>politically and legally questionable.52 Two of his principal advisers, 
>Secretary of Defense Casper W. Weinberger and Secretary of State 
>Shultz, both opposed the initiative for those and other reasons. 
>Nonetheless, the President decided to proceed, and he directed 
>that Congress not be notified.53 
>
>                      Reagan, Poindexter Trial Testimony,