Re: KENLOON ADMITS "REAGAN A REALLY, REALLY BIG LIAR" (and perjurer)

Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:44:31 -0600, Ken
> <ken@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>>> Listed below is what YourDictionary.com says.  If you disagree with
my
>>>> definition, just what is YOUR defintion????
>>> The Model Penal Code, which has been adopted in some form by many
states 
>>> and promulgated by the Commission on Uniform State Laws, also sets
forth 
>>> the following basic elements for the crime of perjury: (1) a false 
>>> statement is made under oath or equivalent affirmation during a
judicial 
>>> proceeding; (2) the statement must be material or relevant to the 
>>> proceeding; and (3) the witness must have the Specific Intent to
deceive.
>>>
>>>
>> 	I don't see any real conflict between our definitions.
> 
> Your definition does not specify what conditions the
> "lie" must be uttered (even under oath)
> 
> Are you incapable of looking up the congressionally
> defined definition of "perjury" in the US CODE?
> 
>> Hillary was 
>> being questioned about fraud in a case where she was a material person.

> 
> Post ANY/ALL evidence here that sup****ts a claim she
> lied.
> 
>>  If she did not answer truthfully the questions while she was under 
>> oath, she was committing perjury.  
> 
> "IF"????
> 
> Are you stupid, KEN?
> 
> You can only claim she "lied" or "committed perjury" if
> PROOF exists she did.
> 
> You're ALLEGING----without ANY proof.

	You can put lipstick on a pig (not necessarily Hillary) and it does not 
change the fact it is a pig.


> 
> What an UNAMERICAN thing to do, KENLOON.
> 
>> Any person who answered 96 questions 
>> with "I cannot recall" truthfully, in a case such as the one she was 
>> involved, is not qualified to be president on that basis alone.  I rest

>> my case.
> 
> So, RONNIE RAYGUN was not qualified and should have
> been removed?
> 
> Why haven't you posted that in a statement, KENLOON?
> 
> He said "I don't recall" over 144 times in his
> Pointdexter deposition---Grand Jury testimony---UNDER
> OATH------then when caught ADMITTED IT.
> 
>> ====================================================================
>>
>> In the case of the two 1985 Israeli arms transfers, President Reagan 
>> knew from the outset that he was acting in conflict with his own 
>> announced policies of not rewarding hostage takers and of not selling 
>> arms to nations sponsoring terrorism. He knew this activity was 
>> politically and legally questionable.52 Two of his principal advisers, 
>> Secretary of Defense Casper W. Weinberger and Secretary of State 
>> Shultz, both opposed the initiative for those and other reasons. 
>> Nonetheless, the President decided to proceed, and he directed 
>> that Congress not be notified.53 
>>
>>                      Reagan, Poindexter Trial Testimony,