Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
> On May 15, 12:13 am, Tim Howard <tim.how...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> So John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama. Big deal. He should have
>> endorsed someone before Penn. At this point, what does his endorsement
>> mean? If I was Obama, I would be thinking "thanks for almost nothing".
>> If Edwards had gotten off the pot and endorsed Obama a couple of
weeks
>> ago, he would have won Indiana and probably would have beaten Clinton
by
>> 20 points or more in NC. If Edwards' endorsement came before Penn, he
>> would have been at least a little closer than 10 points. Why does
>> Edwards endorse him now that the last blue-collar, all-white state's
>> contest is over?
>
> You wish.
>
> Your comment is taken straight from the Republicon talking points.
>
The hell it is.
> Edwards' endorsement means several things:
>
> First, it means we had best get ready for a super-delegate tidal wave
> running in Obama's favor.
>
He would have gotten most of those super-delegates sooner or later. Do
you consider 14 supers to be a "flood"?
> Second, it means one of the following:
> -- VP Edwards and AG Clinton, or,
> -- VP Clinton and AG Edwards.
>
That has nothing to do with my point. BTW it would be a big mistake for
Obama to choose Edwards as his VP. He was a looser already and he is
less popular now than in 2004.
> Either way, it means: The Republicon Party is dead. Dead. Sleeps
> with the fishes. On the trash heap of history.
Obviously you are an Edwards fan.
|
