Eddie Haskell wrote:
> "HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:f0f40653-7801-4223-b059-730805e25e63@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 14, 11:20 pm, "Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names"
> <PopUlist...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On May 15, 12:13 am, Tim Howard <tim.how...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> So John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama. Big deal. He should have
>>> endorsed someone before Penn. At this point, what does his endorsement
>>> mean? If I was Obama, I would be thinking "thanks for almost nothing".
>>> If Edwards had gotten off the pot and endorsed Obama a couple of weeks
>>> ago, he would have won Indiana and probably would have beaten Clinton
by
>>> 20 points or more in NC. If Edwards' endorsement came before Penn, he
>>> would have been at least a little closer than 10 points. Why does
>>> Edwards endorse him now that the last blue-collar, all-white state's
>>> contest is over?
>> You wish.
>>
>> It also means he gets the sup****t of every bottom feeding s***bag
>> trial lawyer.LMAO !!
>
> Yep, the democrat's largest single contributors. A corrupt racket and
the
> little guy pays out the ass.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
>
Everyone hates a lawyer until they need one. I'd rather have a lawyer
in the White House than a war-mongering "patriot" like McCain.
|
