Re: KENLOON ADMITS "REAGAN A REALLY, REALLY BIG LIAR" (and perjurer)!

Ken wrote:
> Lamont Cranston wrote:
>> Ken wrote:
>>> Lamont Cranston wrote:
>>>> Ken wrote:
>>>>> Lamont Cranston wrote:
>>>>>> Ken wrote:
>>>>>>> Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:48:30 -0600, Ken
>>>>>>>> <ken@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 08:48:38 -0600, Ken
>>>>>>>>>> <ken@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nicklas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:53:06 -0700 (PDT), Perry Neheum
>>>>>>>>>>>> <perryneheum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFTER 8 YEARS OF BUSH LIES and Cheney pipedreams and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull**** bubbles, "America" surely doesn't need 4 to 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more years of congenital liar HILLARY CLINTON in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> White House with her red-faced, well-suckled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dishonorable husband.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Except you cannot name ANY "lie" that the Clintons have
>>>>>>>>>>>> told that could remotely compare to the lies of Ronnie
>>>>>>>>>>>> Raygun, Bush 1, and your present miserable lying
>>>>>>>>>>>> sonofa***** Bush 2
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so we admit she IS a liar?
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so you admit that reagan was a bigger liar?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ....and committed perjury to boot?
>>>>>>>>> I am sorry, I had forgotten that she experienced shell shock
>>>>>>>>> in Bosnia and is still suffering from it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sorry" isn't the word for somone who launches tirades
>>>>>>>> against a political opponent using a sham set of
>>>>>>>> "principles" that never seem to apply to your own
>>>>>>>> choice of politician
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called HYPOCRISY
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course that was after "she testified
>>>>>>>>> in 1996 about her work for Madison, Mrs. Clinton said on 99
>>>>>>>>> occasions that she was unable to recall what she might have
>>>>>>>>> done." Could that have been an example of perjury????  America
>>>>>>>>> wants to know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, that's not an example of "perjury", KENLOON
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again I am sorry, for I thought telling a lie while under oath
>>>>>>> was perjury?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is not the definition of perjury.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Listed below is what YourDictionary.com says.  If you disagree
>>>>> with my definition, just what is YOUR defintion????
>>>>
>>>> The Model Penal Code, which has been adopted in some form by many
>>>> states and promulgated by the Commission on Uniform State Laws,
>>>> also sets forth the following basic elements for the crime of
>>>> perjury: (1) a false statement is made under oath or equivalent
>>>> affirmation during a judicial proceeding; (2) the statement must
>>>> be material or relevant to the proceeding; and (3) the witness
>>>> must have the Specific Intent to deceive.
>>>>
>>> I don't see any real conflict between our definitions.  Hillary was
>>> being questioned about fraud in a case where she was a material
>>>  person. If she did not answer truthfully the questions while she
>>> was under oath, she was committing perjury.
>>
>> Damn, you are really stupid, aren't you?  Not answering questions
>> truthfully while under oath is not the definition of perjury.  I just
>> provided you with a definition.  Read it again.  There are three
>> conditions that must be met for perjury to occur.  Answering
>> untruthfully is one of them.  That means that there are two others. See

>> if you can figure out what the other two conditions are.  Hint: they
are 
>> listed above.
>>
>>
>>> Any person who answered 96
>>> questions with "I cannot recall" truthfully, in a case such as the
>>> one she was involved, is not qualified to be president on that basis
>>> alone.
>>
>> On what basis have you determined that her 96 answers of "I cannot
>> recall" were untruthful?  Please be specific.
>
> COMMON SENSE!!!  This woman is supposed to be the smartest woman in
> the world.  How could anyone that smart fail to recall the answer to
> 96 questions????  America wants to know!!!

No, American does not want to know.

Common sense?  ROTFLMAO!!! So, that's your proof that she was lying?  You 
are so incredibly stupid that I am amazed that are able to find your way
to 
a keyboard.

Again, list all 96 questions and provide evidence that she lied when she 
said that she didn't recall.

Here's a question for you.  What did you have for dinner the night before 
you reached the age of 16?