At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I shall add as soon as possible (still
being prevented from this however by a tecnical problem), under "News with
brief comments":
Sunday, 02 March 2008 (NWBC 352) Non-Marx-adherent Dave McGowan again
invited
to MM list
2008-03-02, 17:22 GMT:
Note: The technical problem which from 28.02 on has prevented me from
updating
this homepage still persists. Hopefully it will be solved soon.
I've recently sent the following e-mail.
[QUOTE:]
From:
Rolf Martens <rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date:
Sun., 02 March 2008 17:16 GMT
To:
davemcgowan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dave McGowan)
Cc:
modern marxism <modern_marxism@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject:
Non-Marx-adherent Dave McGowan again invited to MM list
Hello Dave McGowan <davemcgowan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (of California, the USA - and
this
goes to the MM list too; I hope it may interest some others there, plus
I'm
making it an item, number 352, in my series "News with brief comments"),
This is to inform you, once more, that Uncle Anti-Sam (or more precisely,
another of them) wants you on the Modern Marxism mailing list. (Created by
me
in August 2007 and with now 36 members from 5 continents, at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modern_marxism/.)
I know quite well that you're not an adherent of the political line of
Marx,
Lenin and Mao Zedong. But that's not necessary for being welcome on this
list.
(See its description, and an Invitation to it at
http://www.rolf-martens.com/otherdocs/070801_invitation_to_modern_marxism_list.
html.)
If subscribing to it, you'd not necessarily be "inundated" by mails, since
one
can always choose just "daily digest" or also "no e-mails".
In my opinion, many of the writings at that website of yours, "the Center
for
an Informed America" at http://davesweb.cnchost.com/,
are pretty damn
good. I'm
recommending that website to the others at the MM list, not least because
of
your earlier writings on oil - its abiotic origins - which rightly have
become
rather well-known internationally and have been quoted by many others. I'd
find
it nice if stuff by you were to appear directly also on this list.
Your latest, which I saw just now - NEWSLETTER #92, of February 15, 2008,
at
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr92.html
- most of which was on the
presidential election in the USA, in my opinion is very good too. Better,
in
fact, than any of those by some writers in your country who're making
believe
they're Marx adherents. (Big secret, and unfortunately: So far, no genuine
ditto there have been sighted from here - Malmö, Sweden - in the last few
years.)
Concerning oil, I don't remember whether I showed you, firstly, a rather
big
piece (some 150 k) about that which I put on to my homepage (etc) on
30.12.2006, "UNITE! Info #267en: The deep drilling for oil in Sweden,
1986-92",
with details about that venture, in which both Thomas Gold (as the
initiator)
and J. F. Kenney (as the bigger oil exploration expert) took part, and
with
much other stuff, and secondly, the excellent French-language blog "le
pétrole
abiotique" which was set up in August 2005.
The firstmentioned anyway is at
http://www.rolf-martens.com/UNITE%21%20Infos/webstyle1/unite_info_267en.html
and the second at http://petrole-abiotique.blogspot.com/.
That blog actually is linking not only to that expert website of Kenney's,
at
http://www.gasresources.net/,
for which you've been making so much good
propaganda, but also even to my humble homepage, which I of course
appreciate
very much.
With the blogger, Alain, I've had some private correspondence, I think
it's not
wrong to disclose. He firstly has thanked me for making propaganda for
that
blog of his, which he said very much helped making it known, and secondly
has
expressed some surprise at and appreciation of the fact that I too - as
had he
- had seen through not only the big "official" lie concerning oil's origin
but
also the ditto concerning "HIV"/"AIDS", which is a rather different
subject.
And he told me that he was also the person running that nice website on
the
latter thing, which I had already seen, "$IDA OU SANTÉ ?" ("AID$ OR
HEALTH?")
at http://pagesperso-orange.fr/sidasante/.
I'm linking to that one too,
under
the heading in my "Links" section "On purportedly existing 'HIV' and
'AIDS'".
It was somebody's tipping me off about the (Australia-based) website
www.virusmyth.net, in August 2000, that made me see the - pretty fantastic
-
truth on that one: Their neither *is* any "HIV", nor any "AIDS". Those
fantasy
things were just invented, by the US government's (military-managed) "EIS"
("Epidemic Intelligence Service", a kind of "CIA of medicine"), in order
to
terrorize people and make some of them take some poisonous
good-for-nothing
"medicines". (Could be another field for some research by you too,
perhaps.
Necessary for understanding it is "a horribly suspicious, conspiratorial
mind"
concerning those persons who today are "running" this planet - something
which
it seems to me that you have.)
Now what I also appreciate about you, Dave, is your "private-detective"
instinct and ability, which I think is pretty good. You've written some
stuff
about that "911" thing too - as have many others of course. On that, I on
my
part haven't understood much of all the details, but at least I've been
concluding, from 20.09.2001 on, that it was the US government that
orchestrated
it, which is the politically most important thing, I hold.
Yours on Flight 93 - the one that crashed into the ground - I found good.
As
I've told you before, I regret to say, though, that concerning the
Pentagon
event on 11.09.2001, it does seem to me that that awful reactionary
Michael
Rivero of "WhatReallyHappened" is basically right and you're basically
wrong.
(As for mistakes, I'm suspecting that I on my part have been making one on
a
certain scientific question - see a note to the heading "On the pesticide
DDT"
in my "Links" section - and am still not certain precisely where the truth
on
it lies.) That "private eye" instinct of yours for instance made you
suspect,
I've seen, already relatively long ago, that the "manmade global warming"
propaganda was a big hoax too. Most likely, you today already know that it
is
one, I'm guessing.
Your not knowing - I believe - much of that theory about society which was
first advanced by Karl Marx rather long ago does give you a certain
handicap as
"private eye", in my judgment. But also, lots of people who do know that
theory
relatively well have turned out to be extremely naive (if not something
worse)
on many questions of importance in today's society - much worse than you,
for
instance, on some of them.
But I'm repeating myself a little here. Anyway, how about it?
Regards,
Rolf Martens
Malmö, Sweden
Phone and fax:
+46 - 40 - 124832;
rolf.martens@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OF QUOTE]
|
