Bruce Scott TOK <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:200801031615.m03GFve7010922@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bloody Hell she's at 51% with Obama next below 20 (this is from
> November, but still...). So I guess it's quite irrelevant for me to
> vote for Edwards there (even though not entirely convinced yet).
> Apparently her Latin sup****t is well above 60 percent.
>
> (found this on the Burnt Orange site... google for it)
>
> Primary is 4 March, and the DLC will most likely have decided it for us
> by then, helped of course by her friends in the media...
>
Correct. Texas is irrelevant for the Democratic party, other than trying
to get donations. The nominee will be decided by Texas March 4th vote and
the national election will have Texas go for a republican no matter who
it is. I think Obama is in the drivers seat now. He could win New
Hamp****re, South Carolina, and Nevada going into February's super
Tuesday. I am also an Edwards sup****ter, but unfortunately he had to win
Iowa because the others are even tougher. I would like to see Edwards
throw his sup****t to Obama before super Tuesday which could seal the deal
for Obama. We will see how good of politicians the Clintons are now. They
are very good, so you never know what might happen.
|
