Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Democrats II > Re: Presidentia...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 53 Topic 107685 of 113515
Post > Topic >>

Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade

by "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 19, 2008 at 05:46 PM

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:t5k234dp9iqegbl7nj82e9euno768i32u3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"  used a stick in the sand to babble
> >"Governor Swill"  wrote...
> >> Besides, with the dollar tanking, free trade is
> >> actually desirable.
>
> >The phony pretense of "free trade," along with the neo-conservative's
> >phony wars for profit, IS what is 'tanking' the US Dollar.

> You're ignorant too.  Free trade isn't tanking the dollar.

As has already been mentioned, it's not "free trade".... it's controlled
trade.

> It's a global currency.

Hey ****ll.... it's NOT a 'global currency'... at least not yet.

> The dollar is tanking because Bush and the GOP printed trillions of
> them and threw them all over the place.  It's a supply/demand issue.
> But you would know that if you knew about capitalism and economics.

Kiss my ass.



http://www.totse.com/en/politics/economic_do***ents/nafta1.html

http://www.earlham.edu/~pols/17Fall97/nafta/index.html


        EARLY EFFECTS:
        "Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was
        signed in 1993, the rise in the U.S. trade deficit with Canada and
        Mexico through 2002 caused the displacement of production that
        sup****ted 879,280 U.S. jobs. NAFTA is a free trade and investment
        agreement that provided investors with a unique set of guarantees
        designed to stimulate foreign direct investment in Mexico and
Canada.
        It has facilitated the movement of factories from the United
States to
        Canada and Mexico. Most of these jobs were high-wage positions in
        manufacturing industries."    -- US Economic Policy Institute
(EPI)

http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_snapshots_archive_12102003


• The agreement has taken a toll on both U.S. and Mexican jobs,
according to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS). While real wages
for Mexican manufacturing workers declined 13.5%, more than
half a million U.S. employees have entered government retraining
programs after their companies moved production south or north
of the border, says IPS.

• NAFTA has wiped out Canadian social programs, says IPS.

• The pact has also destroyed Mexico's small farmers, says IPS,
bringing in an influx of subsidized U.S. food im****ts. In fact, about
1.3 million farm jobs have been lost since 1993, indicates a recent
re****t by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
"NAFTA has been a disaster for us," remarks pig farmer Julian
Aguilera to Business Week.

• The Carnegie re****t also concluded that the pact has generated
few new jobs in Mexico and might only be credited for a "very small
net gain" in jobs in the U.S.

• The new study also found that NAFTA has been ineffective in
stemming the tide of illegal Mexican immigrants entering the U.S.
to find jobs. In fact, according to most estimates, the number of
Mexicans working illegally in the U.S. surged to 4.8 million in 2000,
more than twice the 1990 total.


http://www.vdare.com/awall/nafta.htm


--- Martha Ojeda
    "The only winners of (NAFTA) are the cor****ations. And all
    social sectors of civil society working class, middle class,
    small and medium enterprises, students and universities
    and even governments need to unite to fight against these
    negative impacts," said Ojeda, who is the executive director
    for the Coalition for Justice in the Maquiladoras.

    Maquiladora workers face air and water pollutions, poor living
    conditions, birth defects and miscarriages from toxic exposure,
    ***ual harassment and police brutality while earning about $50
    a week, Ojeda added. "These workers are in similar or worse
    condition than before 1995 when NAFTA was put into effect,"
    Ojeda said. The promises of a higher standard of living and an
    increase in employment in the border zones of Mexico have
    merely become broken promises.  The current recession in the
    U.S. has led to more than 300,000 maquiladora employees losing
    their jobs.


Here.... this is apparently, about your speed....
http://media.www.guilfordian.com/media/storage/paper281/news/2007/12/07/Features/Students.Learn.About.Negative.Effects.Of.Nafta.On.Their.Trip.To.Oaxaca.Mexico-3143036.shtml
 




 53 Posts in Topic:
Advice for Michelle Obama
pres <afamreport@[EMAI  2008-05-15 03:48:57 
Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"CTC" <ctc_p  2008-05-15 12:58:30 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-05-16 09:29:45 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-16 20:06:02 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-05-17 07:19:04 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-17 18:06:38 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-05-18 08:44:20 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-19 01:47:33 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-19 02:39:36 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-18 07:08:20 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-17 14:31:51 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-17 20:09:28 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-05-18 08:52:08 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-19 02:10:17 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-19 06:04:33 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-19 17:44:06 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-22 02:41:17 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-26 06:57:04 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-17 14:25:13 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-17 20:11:07 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"Jerry Okamura"  2008-05-18 08:50:53 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-19 02:21:37 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-19 06:08:37 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-19 17:46:32 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-22 02:44:30 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-26 07:03:57 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-28 01:39:01 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-28 06:16:51 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-30 01:19:21 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-30 15:52:13 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-31 01:50:08 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-31 06:29:45 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-05-31 20:25:27 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-06-01 06:23:02 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-01 20:41:44 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-01 09:56:39 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-06-02 07:36:28 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-02 11:20:37 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-06-02 16:48:41 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-19 18:32:56 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-05-20 07:41:24 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
lorad474@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-02 10:14:00 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-03 02:21:31 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-06-03 18:13:17 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-04 00:46:18 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-06-04 06:47:06 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-05 00:20:26 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-06-20 07:00:30 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"zzbunker@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-31 00:04:43 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-01 09:58:14 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"David Morgan \(MAMS  2008-06-02 07:37:35 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
Governor Swill <govern  2008-06-02 11:00:54 
Re: Presidential Candidates Get Specific on Trade
"zzbunker@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-22 00:40:37 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 0:44:02 CDT 2008.