Re: WAY BACK JACK HOPES FOR RISE OF CONFEDERACY AGAIN

On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:11:57 GMT, nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Nobama) wrote:

>On Mon, 19 May 2008 18:30:35 -0500, Starkiller
><NoSpam.SKS_SKanz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>>He posts numbers, you post nothing but pure rhetoric.
>>Gee, who to believe.
>>
>>
>For blacks for the year 2000 OOW was 68.5% per:
>
>http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/pdf/nvsr50_05tb19.pdf
>
>I have seen as high as 69.1% for other years.
>
>Births to unmarried women 	
>All Races	White  White/non-Hisp	Black  Black/non-Hisp	
>1,347,043 	866,355   521,686 	426,649   415,152
>
>Hispanic
>348,173
>
>
>Percent unmarried
>All Races	White  White/non-Hisp	Black  Black/non-Hisp
>33.2		27.1 22.1 		68.5 68.7
>
>Hispanic
>42.7
>
>
>The highest OOW birthrate for white-non-hispanic is in the US Virgin 
>Islands (so much for virgins) followed by Maine and West Virginia. The
>
>lowest rate for white-non-hispanic OOW births is, surprisingly, in the
>
>District of Columbia, at a mere 8.7 percent. Nobody else comes close
>to 
>that low a rate other than Utah at 13%.

And the first to respond is the guy with the data.  Imagine that.  
But I still have a lot of faith that little Nicky will respond in the
same intelligent manner as he did previously.  LOL








Regards


Starkiller