Goo: you do *not* present a challenge - ever. You *CANNOT*.
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, the one and only Goo and a staggeringly
stupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 13:24:37 -0700, Rudy Canoza
<pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, the one and only Goo and a staggeringly
stupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>>
>>> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Rudy X. Canoza wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, the one and only Goo and a staggeringly
stupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Rudy G. Canoza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did it take so long, Goo?
>>>>> Probably perturbations
>>>>
>>>> you do *not* know the meaning of the word 'perturbation', Goo.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why haven't you learned in over NINE years, Goo, that your entire
"take"
>>>>>> on the issue of animal "rights" is bull****?
>>>>> How do you think pointing out the fact
>>>>
>>>> You do not "point out" any fact, Goo; nor do you "challenge" anyone.
>>>>
>>>> Your answer was a non-sequitur, Goo. I asked you why you haven't
learned,
>>>> in over NINE years of futility here, that your entire "take" on the
issue of
>>>> animal "rights" is bull****? Answer the question, Goo. Your take
*is* bull****,
>>>> and we want to know why you haven't been able to figure that out in
over NINE
>>>> years of ****ing around here.
>>>>>
>>>>>> There are valid, logical and moral reasons for opposing "ar"
>>>>> Yet you have repeatedly indicated that
>>>>
>>>> No, Goo. *I* have elaborated logical and correct opposition to "ar".
>>>>
>>> As I correctly predicted
>> No, Goo. You did not "predict" anything,
>
> In contrast to that lie
No, Goo. No lie. You did not "predict" anything. You spewed more
cracker bull****; that's all.
You do not "predict", you do not "point out", you do not "challenge".
You're a stupid cracker, Goo - you have *ADMITTED* it. You're just
jerking off here. You're a lifelong jerk-off - not a serious
contributor at all.
|
