Re: NY TIMES sheds all pretense of their Partisan Liberal Bias

On Jul 23, 6:39=A0pm, "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Mitchell Holman" <Noem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns9AE451FFC35B5ta2eene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >news:n5Fhk.16039$mh5.10336@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> "Mitchell Holman" <Noem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>news:Xns9AE3DACDE2C3Bta2eene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >>>news:3Vjhk.13860$cW3.12272@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> "Mitchell Holman" <Noem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>>news:Xns9AE2E4195ECDDta2eene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >>>>> news:5lbhk.15943$mh5.6742 @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>>> "Richard" <rander3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:woSdneC-ScFAoxjVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> Just wait, =A0the Hollywood cabal (in-league with the Times and
t=
he
> >>>>>>> L.A. Times) is going to inundate us with pro-lib crap as
election
> >>>>>>> time approaches, and as always, avoid like the plague anything
th=
at
> >>>>>>> detracts from their left-lib biases.
>
> >>>>>> It's to be expected. However, I believe the silver lining is
their
> >>>>>> uncontrollably continuing this drum beat which will ultimately be
> >>>>>> the undoing for both the liberal media whores and the liberal
> >>>>>> establishment in
> >>>>>> general, because it only makes conservatives stronger in the long
> >>>>>> haul. Furthermore notices when one of their own get chided by the
> >>>>>> rest and won't
> >>>>>> go along, like the Clintons just did.
>
> >>>>> =A0 =A0That would be the same "liberal media" that pounded
> >>>>> candidate Clinton over Gennifer Flowers and trips to
> >>>>> Moscow and draft letters but never discovered candidate
> >>>>> Bush's drunk driving CONVICTION until the arresting cop
> >>>>> called the press, even tho it was *public record*?
>
> >>>> You would be referring to that main stream liberal press that
waited
> >>>> until the Friday before election day to release what amounted to a
> >>>> 30-year old non-event, full well hoping/knowing a response by the
Bu=
sh
> >>>> campaign would be impossible....
>
> >>> =A0 Maybe it wouldn't have been such an issue if Bush
> >>> hadn't LIED about it when asked.
>
> >> Thanks for admitting liberal press bias in their ill-fated attempt to
> >> influence the 2000 election with 25 to 30-year old news.
>
> > =A0 =A0So 25 year old stories about Bush are "stale news"
> > but even older stories about Clinton are "vital interest".
>
> Big diff lib. The Clinton being a draft dodger came out in due course
dur=
ing
> the election year. However dems tried ambu****ng Bush 3-days before
electi=
on
> day as an October surprise not giving the campaign anytime to respond.
It
> goes to show how desperately dishonest your ilk are!

Speaking of dishonest, were you ever in combat during the Vietnam war,
Yo-Yo?

476 times you've been asked,

S. Olson