"Tom Sr." <tomswiftsenior@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4e87cccf-7e10-4c01-ace5-f36fe86f4e08@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 24, 9:32 am, "Bob" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "jamezd" <jamezd2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote...
>>> *Unlike the retard currently occupying the oval office,
>>> back in 2003 *Obama knew well that invading a
>>> middle eastern country that posed no *serious*
>>> threat to US interest was reckless and ill-advised.
>> -
>> As it looks now, his vote was probably the right one. However, that
>> is hindsight. It was the wrong vote based on the data at the time.
>
> I think Obama, like some other sane Americans, realized years ago what
> a ****ing, incompetent liar Bush was -- and that he was *not* to be
> trusted.
>
> Why do Republicans *never* condemn W. Bush for the serious and lasting
> harm he did to the United States' principles with both the American
> people and the people of the world by showing a President of the
> United States of American would LIE US INTO STARTING A WAR?
1. Quote the lie.
2. Demonstrate it was false at the time.
3. Demonstrate Bush knew it was false at the time.
Can you do that?
> The next President *will* need to spend years of time, effort, and
> money on reparing the damage Bush, his Administration, and a 6-years
> Republican Congress did to the United States of America and its place
> in the world.
There's no need to start the excuses
before they're needed.
|
