> I understand what McCain meant and how it came out. =A0The 'hundred
> years' thing is simply campaign rhetoric built on a misstatement.
But it's pretty sad that Obama is criticizing McCain for something he
himself sup****ts.
>
> He's clearly calling for permanent basing in Iraq in order to fill the
> perceived need for at least one ground base in the ME.
And so is Obama...Whom is going to win Iraq with less people.
[Rumsfeld redux]
>
All partisan****p aside, can't you honestly admit that Obama is clearly
wrong on this?
>
> >Note: Obama wants troops in Iraq for a hundred years too.
> ><Doofus Racist Obama on his magical "strike force">
> >=93In order to end this war responsibly, I will immediately begin to
> >remove our troops from Iraq. We can responsibly remove 1 to 2 combat
> >brigades each month. If we start with the number of brigades we have
> >in Iraq today, we can remove all of them 16 months. After this
> >redeployment, we will leave enough troops in Iraq to guard our embassy
> >and diplomats, and a counter-terrorism force to strike al Qaeda if it
> >forms a base that the Iraqis cannot destroy. What I propose is not --
> >and never has been -- a precipitous drawdown. It is instead a detailed
> >and prudent plan that will end a war nearly seven years after it
> >started.=94
>
> Sounds like a plan,
That has already been tried by Rumsfeld. [How did that work out
again?]
Obama is wrong, wrong, wrong.
>
> In case you
> missed it November 2006, anti Iraq sentiment ****fted power in the
> Congress and the Republicans have lost every Presidential election
> since.
A) To Blue Dog Democrats that hate Pelosi and think Obama is wrong on
Iraq. Obama is wrong.
B) A great leader doesn't do things to get elected...He acts for the
good of his people. Obama is wrong.
|
