A green light for state terrorism is part of US plutocracy's grand
plan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The USA is a failed state- a failed democratic state. When capitalism
gains effective control of all media and the lion share of all wealth,
the stage is set for plutocracy not democracy. The difference between
a capitalist and a plutocrat is that if you get in a plutocrat's way-
you might be killed. The population of Gaza, Lebanon and Iraq know
this only too well. If one opposes US plutocracy's geopolitical oil
grab, the prospect of being labelled 'terrorist' is very high indeed.
If US plutocracy coverts geo-political control of the Iraqi and
Iranian oil fields, how do you seize them, and make it look like a
respectable act of self-defence?
Why not a terror campaign in Palestine using the Zionists dream of a
Greater Israel as the opening gambit? The plutocrat's tactics -
creating the steps as means to ends, is to create a dialogue of
violence. A tit for tat escalation that eventually is in favour of the
super power where it may claim that it is acting purely in defence of
citizens not is defence of the expansionary interest of plutocracy,
and thereafter bring the full destructive power of its military
against its quarry.
If you give Zionists every armament they desire as well as the fissile
material for nuclear weapons- given the fanaticism of monotheism, the
plutocrats know that they will abuse it. Israeli expansion via state
terrorism is the inevitable result- the quest for Greater Israel at
the expense of the indigenous Muslim population of the Middle-East.
State-terror is naturally followed by resistance-terror- a tit for
tat. Since plutocracy controls most of the propaganda stream of the
western media, it omits all focus on the subject of 'state terror' but
rigorously focuses on 'resistance-terror' as thought the former never
existed and the latter can be then characterized as a calamitous
'evil' threatening world peace and stability. Dropping the
'resistance' fragment from the labelling of 'terror' is good
plutocratic propaganda. Could you ever imagine plutocracy referring to
Hamas or Hezbolah as the evil resistance-terrorists? This simple
modification of language obscures the historical fact that these
groups emerged under a Zionist occupation full equipped and supplied
by US plutocracy.
When plutocracy owns history, it may up the ante by increasing
state-terrorist attacks for the purpose of eliciting a
resistance-terrorist response that it may seize on as a pretext for
escalation.
As plutocracy wants to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities, it needs a
suitable pretext.
As Iraq pulls the USA deeper into a quagmire, US plutocracy under Bush
is desperately looking for scape-goats for their bungled Iraq
campaign. Upping the Zionist state-terrorism in Lebanon by targeting
the civilian population and civilian infrastructure is designed to
coax Syria and Iran into the war in order to expand it.
Given that Israel is supplied with the latest US laser guided missiles
with pin-point accuracy, it does not need to target apartments filled
with Lebanese women and children to destroy a mobile rocket launcher
other than as a provocation to the Islamic world.
Readers in the West may now reinterpret 9/11 from a Muslim
perspective. Plutocracy's strategy is to encourage stupidity of the
part of Islamic states - pretending it didn't care if Saddam invaded
Kuwait and then to respond with overwhelming military force when he
did so. The gullibility of the west can be exploited in the UN to
weaken such states prior to plutocratic invasion. Resistance-terrorism
works to its advantage by being a non-state entity. Plutocracy does
best when the 'tit for tat' is between state actors, as the
probability of success lies with the more powerful. Tit for tat
between a superpower and the non-state actor favours the latter where
the latter remains invisible to its enemy. Given sufficient
creativity on the part of the resistance entity, a super power is
vulnerable. Thus, 9/11 was a tit for tat that achieved its objective.
This is purely an evolutionary contest between predatory plutocracy
and its quarries, not a moral contest about who is 'right'. If a lion
eats sufficient quarries it lives otherwise it starves and dies. Who
is to say lions are more righteous than their quarry. Empty moralism
about the 'good guys' and 'bad guys' that obscures an evolutionary
conflict in religious terms is extremely dangerous. In an evolutionary
conflict to increase wealth and power either may win and both may
loose.
So when US plutocracy is handing out green lights for state-terrorism,
secularists not infected with moral zealotry might first brush up on
history and the political stakes before becoming pawns in their game.
Dev Carter
|
