BlankThe May Feature at The Return Of The Gods Web Site [An American
Conservative Resource] begins as follows:
"The emergence of Senator Obama, as a serious contender for the Presidency
of the United States, may well precipitate a demonstration of just how
truly
confused, concepts of race and racial preferences have become in
contem****ary America. The campaign also promises to stir cross-currents
that seem certain to bring many of the chickens of Leftwing folly, home to
roost.
"While we could not sup****t the Senator for ideological reasons, quite
apart
from any consideration of genes or genealogy, our primary focus will be
not
on specific issues, but on the perceptions and dynamics of race and racial
preferences, in the social climate revealed by the Obama campaign, and its
context among historic movements. In this, we must take a functional look
at two generations of focused agitation.
"What has induced us to again turn to the Obama phenomenon has not been
anything the candidate has said, nor what his sup****ters have said;
although
some of their comments are relevant--at least in the sense of being
revealing. Rather, we have been prodded by the idiotic remarks of some of
Obama's "modern" Republican foes, who felt compelled to assure the world
that while there might still be 'ignorant, hate' driven Whites who would
vote against Obama because of his race; America--as a whole--has outgrown
such bias. One such talk show host, in particular, illustrated this not
so
clever analysis, almost as an apology for the obvious emergence of a
racial
factor in the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary. The Republican, in
question,
felt a need to distance himself from any such racial preference, while
still
enthusiastically sup****ting Senator McCain! Comments such as his, and the
repeated images of huge crowds, of diverse types, chanting in a unison
reminiscent of Nazi rallies from the 1930s, dictated our choice.
"There is a familiar, almost pathological, need among pro-Administration
Republicans, both Neocons and survivors of the Rockefeller faction from
the
Goldwater era, <i>not</i> to discuss the Democratic dilemma over Obama and
race; certainly <i>not</i> with words that might suggest that any
<i>reasonable</i> voter might choose to consider a candidate's lineage.
At
least, this is clearly a taboo, if the hypothetical voter happens to be a
rooted White Caucasian, who might take pride in a settler heritage. In
this, of course, the Republican Left 'apes' the long-standing attitude of
the American Left, generally--those, who have not only advocated coercive
legislation, both proper and judicial, in the name of "Civil Rights," but
an
increasingly vicious stigmatization of White Americans who still
demonstrate
pride in being part of that settler heritage. Thus, such Republicans, as
the confused White Democrats--currently in a quandary over Obama's past
ties
to a racially motivated and belligerent Rev. Wright, and the potential for
a
major White backlash destroying their prospects for November--are unable
to
rationally address the coming election (and the potential fall out
therefrom) in an historic or ethnic perspective.
"Meanwhile, those who seek to exploit minorities--the Jesse Jacksons, Al
Sharptons, etc.--those, who feed off the intellectual confusion of the
American mainstream on anything having to do with race or ethnic
awareness,
are being handed the op****tunity of their lives to undermine what remains
of
social peace and tranquility in America. When Obama--having drawn those
huge crowds across the Continent--was confronted with the publication of
some of Reverend Wright's anti-White pronouncements, he sought to distance
himself, not by repudiating the attacks on traditional American
culture--or
on a political system, he seeks to lead--but by reference to their
"divisiveness." And he stated, in effect, that Wright was in error for
advocating "self-help" without realizing that (according to Obama)
self-help
would not be effective unless America could be changed!
"Obama is not more conservative than Reverend Wright. To the contrary, he
is to his Left. Obama is no friendlier to traditional American concepts,
he
simply denies hating White people. But this does not mean he does not
hate.
To Obama, it appears that the "more perfect Union," to which he has
repeatedly adverted, is one where only a single American identity, in a
new
egalitarian society, will be acceptable. Obama's "more perfect Union," is
not one where individual States may dissent from a common unity of
purpose,
nor one where traditional communities may maintain separate identities;
rather a monolithic coming together, in the name of "change," as defined
by
Obama.
"The Obama phenomenon is the culmination of an over two generation attack
on
the Union of the Fathers, an increasingly frenetic attack on the ethnic
identity of Americans of White settler stock, as a unique people; and,
while
it may appeal to the doctrinaire Leftist, it is hardly what even the
modern
'Liberal' actually sought--or 'signed onto'--at the start of the process.
No one, actually elected to Office in the 'New Deal,' would have joined
the
contem****ary assault on the mere display of the Confederate Battle Flag;
on
the traditional pride of the American Southerner in his settler and
Confederate heritage; on anyone's taking pride in his own race or lineage,
and wanting to preserve same. Nor were such assaults yet common in
mainstream "Liberal" circles, in the days of Kennedy & Johnson.
"There were certainly active efforts to attack practices deemed unfriendly
to minorities. But few mainstream Americans, indeed, equated simple pride
in an Anglo-Saxon or Celtic heritage with bigotry; few, indeed, thought it
unacceptable that a small town, with strong Christian roots, would display
the Ten Commandments, or hold a community wide religious observance. Only
a
small fringe attacked such things. Yet the quality of our politics, on
average, has been declining since the 19th Century. While few attacked
heritage overtly, few showed a proclivity to defend it against persistent
attacks by that small fringe. By the latter days of the Clinton
Administration, a profound ****ft had taken place in public
perceptions--and,
as in the era of the Nazi accession in Germany, many things that would
once
have seemed unthinkable, became part of an accepted reality. Intimidated,
those who knew better remained silent. What is ironic, in the present
Obama
phenomenon, is that the Clintons, who epitomized the promotion and
acceptance of the new dispensation, would be among its early victims. In
the depths of Hell, 'Citizen' Robespierre may be smiling."
The article then goes forward to discuss the possible Communist and Nazi
contributions to the mass mindset, demonstrated by the chanting Obama
sup****ters and their leader. For access, use this link:
http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/chickens.htm
|
