On May 9, 6:55=A0am, "William Flax" <krtq7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> BlankThe May Feature at The Return Of The Gods Web Site [An American
> Conservative Resource] begins as follows:
>
> "The emergence of Senator Obama, as a serious contender for the
Presidency=
> of the United States, may well precipitate a demonstration of just how
tru=
ly
> confused, concepts of race and racial preferences have become in
> contem****ary America. =A0The campaign also promises to stir
cross-currents=
> that seem certain to bring many of the chickens of Leftwing folly, home
to=
> roost.
>
> "While we could not sup****t the Senator for ideological reasons, quite
apa=
rt
> from any consideration of genes or genealogy, our primary focus will be
no=
t
> on specific issues, but on the perceptions and dynamics of race and
racial=
> preferences, in the social climate revealed by the Obama campaign, and
its=
> context among historic movements. =A0In this, we must take a functional
lo=
ok
> at two generations of focused agitation.
>
> "What has induced us to again turn to the Obama phenomenon has not been
> anything the candidate has said, nor what his sup****ters have said;
althou=
gh
> some of their comments are relevant--at least in the sense of being
> revealing. =A0Rather, we have been prodded by the idiotic remarks of
some =
of
> Obama's "modern" Republican foes, who felt compelled to assure the world
> that while there might still be 'ignorant, hate' driven Whites who would
> vote against Obama because of his race; America--as a whole--has
outgrown
> such bias. =A0One such talk show host, in particular, illustrated this
not=
so
> clever analysis, almost as an apology for the obvious emergence of a
racia=
l
> factor in the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary. =A0The Republican, in
quest=
ion,
> felt a need to distance himself from any such racial preference, while
sti=
ll
> enthusiastically sup****ting Senator McCain! =A0Comments such as his, and
t=
he
> repeated images of huge crowds, of diverse types, chanting in a unison
> reminiscent of Nazi rallies from the 1930s, dictated our choice.
>
> "There is a familiar, almost pathological, need among pro-Administration
> Republicans, both Neocons and survivors of the Rockefeller faction from
th=
e
> Goldwater era, <i>not</i> to discuss the Democratic dilemma over Obama
and=
> race; certainly <i>not</i> with words that might suggest that any
> <i>reasonable</i> voter might choose to consider a candidate's lineage.
=
=A0At
> least, this is clearly a taboo, if the hypothetical voter happens to be
a
> rooted White Caucasian, who might take pride in a settler heritage.
=A0In
> this, of course, the Republican Left 'apes' the long-standing attitude
of
> the American Left, generally--those, who have not only advocated
coercive
> legislation, both proper and judicial, in the name of "Civil Rights,"
but =
an
> increasingly vicious stigmatization of White Americans who still
demonstra=
te
> pride in being part of that settler heritage. =A0Thus, such Republicans,
a=
s
> the confused White Democrats--currently in a quandary over Obama's past
ti=
es
> to a racially motivated and belligerent Rev. Wright, and the potential
for=
a
> major White backlash destroying their prospects for November--are unable
t=
o
> rationally address the coming election (and the potential fall out
> therefrom) in an historic or ethnic perspective.
>
> "Meanwhile, those who seek to exploit minorities--the Jesse Jacksons, Al
> Sharptons, etc.--those, who feed off the intellectual confusion of the
> American mainstream on anything having to do with race or ethnic
awareness=
,
> are being handed the op****tunity of their lives to undermine what
remains =
of
> social peace and tranquility in America. =A0When Obama--having drawn
those=
> huge crowds across the Continent--was confronted with the publication of
> some of Reverend Wright's anti-White pronouncements, he sought to
distance=
> himself, not by repudiating the attacks on traditional American
culture--o=
r
> on a political system, he seeks to lead--but by reference to their
> "divisiveness." =A0And he stated, in effect, that Wright was in error
for
> advocating "self-help" without realizing that (according to Obama)
self-he=
lp
> would not be effective unless America could be changed!
>
> "Obama is not more conservative than Reverend Wright. =A0To the
contrary, =
he
> is to his Left. =A0Obama is no friendlier to traditional American
concepts=
, he
> simply denies hating White people. =A0But this does not mean he does not
h=
ate.
> To Obama, it appears that the "more perfect Union," to which he has
> repeatedly adverted, is one where only a single American identity, in a
ne=
w
> egalitarian society, will be acceptable. =A0Obama's "more perfect
Union," =
is
> not one where individual States may dissent from a common unity of
purpose=
,
> nor one where traditional communities may maintain separate identities;
> rather a monolithic coming together, in the name of "change," as defined
b=
y
> Obama.
>
> "The Obama phenomenon is the culmination of an over two generation
attack =
on
> the Union of the Fathers, an increasingly frenetic attack on the ethnic
> identity of Americans of White settler stock, as a unique people; and,
whi=
le
> it may appeal to the doctrinaire Leftist, it is hardly what even the
moder=
n
> 'Liberal' actually sought--or 'signed onto'--at the start of the
process.
> No one, actually elected to Office in the 'New Deal,' would have joined
th=
e
> contem****ary assault on the mere display of the Confederate Battle Flag;
o=
n
> the traditional pride of the American Southerner in his settler and
> Confederate heritage; on anyone's taking pride in his own race or
lineage,=
> and wanting to preserve same. =A0Nor were such assaults yet common in
> mainstream "Liberal" circles, in the days of Kennedy & Johnson.
>
> "There were certainly active efforts to attack practices deemed
unfriendly=
> to minorities. =A0But few mainstream Americans, indeed, equated simple
pri=
de
> in an Anglo-Saxon or Celtic heritage with bigotry; few, indeed, thought
it=
> unacceptable that a small town, with strong Christian roots, would
display=
> the Ten Commandments, or hold a community wide religious observance.
=A0On=
ly a
> small fringe attacked such things. =A0Yet the quality of our politics,
on
> average, has been declining since the 19th Century. =A0While few
attacked
> heritage overtly, few showed a proclivity to defend it against
persistent
> attacks by that small fringe. =A0By the latter days of the Clinton
> Administration, a profound ****ft had taken place in public
perceptions--an=
d,
> as in the era of the Nazi accession in Germany, many things that would
onc=
e
> have seemed unthinkable, became part of an accepted reality.
=A0Intimidate=
d,
> those who knew better remained silent. =A0What is ironic, in the present
O=
bama
> phenomenon, is that the Clintons, who epitomized the promotion and
> acceptance of the new dispensation, would be among its early victims.
=A0I=
n
> the depths of Hell, 'Citizen' Robespierre may be smiling."
>
> The article then goes forward to discuss the possible Communist and Nazi
> contributions to the mass mindset, demonstrated by the chanting Obama
> sup****ters and their leader. =A0For access, use this link:
>
> http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/chickens.htm
Obama will prove to be a slave of Israel the same as any other of the
traditional party contenders with the exception of Ron Paul.
If America fails to put Ron Paul in the White House, they can kiss
their collective white and black ***** adios.
|
