On May 8, 1:55=A0pm, "William Flax" <krtq7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> BlankThe May Feature at The Return Of The Gods Web Site [An American
> Conservative Resource] begins as follows:
>
> "The emergence of Senator Obama, as a serious contender for the
Presidency=
> of the United States, may well precipitate a demonstration of just how
tru=
ly
> confused, concepts of race and racial preferences have become in
> contem****ary America. =A0The campaign also promises to stir
cross-currents=
> that seem certain to bring many of the chickens of Leftwing folly, home
to=
> roost.
>
> "While we could not sup****t the Senator for ideological reasons, quite
apa=
rt
> from any consideration of genes or genealogy, our primary focus will be
no=
t
> on specific issues, but on the perceptions and dynamics of race and
racial=
> preferences, in the social climate revealed by the Obama campaign, and
its=
> context among historic movements. =A0In this, we must take a functional
lo=
ok
> at two generations of focused agitation.
>
> "What has induced us to again turn to the Obama phenomenon has not been
> anything the candidate has said, nor what his sup****ters have said;
althou=
gh
> some of their comments are relevant--at least in the sense of being
> revealing. =A0Rather, we have been prodded by the idiotic remarks of
some =
of
> Obama's "modern" Republican foes, who felt compelled to assure the world
> that while there might still be 'ignorant, hate' driven Whites who would
> vote against Obama because of his race; America--as a whole--has
outgrown
> such bias. =A0One such talk show host, in particular, illustrated this
not=
so
> clever analysis, almost as an apology for the obvious emergence of a
racia=
l
> factor in the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary. =A0The Republican, in
quest=
ion,
> felt a need to distance himself from any such racial preference, while
sti=
ll
> enthusiastically sup****ting Senator McCain! =A0Comments such as his, and
t=
he
> repeated images of huge crowds, of diverse types, chanting in a unison
> reminiscent of Nazi rallies from the 1930s, dictated our choice.
>
> "There is a familiar, almost pathological, need among pro-Administration
> Republicans, both Neocons and survivors of the Rockefeller faction from
th=
e
> Goldwater era, <i>not</i> to discuss the Democratic dilemma over Obama
and=
> race; certainly <i>not</i> with words that might suggest that any
> <i>reasonable</i> voter might choose to consider a candidate's lineage.
=
=A0At
> least, this is clearly a taboo, if the hypothetical voter happens to be
a
> rooted White Caucasian, who might take pride in a settler heritage.
=A0In
> this, of course, the Republican Left 'apes' the long-standing attitude
of
> the American Left, generally--those, who have not only advocated
coercive
> legislation, both proper and judicial, in the name of "Civil Rights,"
but =
an
> increasingly vicious stigmatization of White Americans who still
demonstra=
te
> pride in being part of that settler heritage. =A0Thus, such Republicans,
a=
s
> the confused White Democrats--currently in a quandary over Obama's past
ti=
es
> to a racially motivated and belligerent Rev. Wright, and the potential
for=
a
> major White backlash destroying their prospects for November--are unable
t=
o
> rationally address the coming election (and the potential fall out
> therefrom) in an historic or ethnic perspective.
>
> "Meanwhile, those who seek to exploit minorities--the Jesse Jacksons, Al
> Sharptons, etc.--those, who feed off the intellectual confusion of the
> American mainstream on anything having to do with race or ethnic
awareness=
,
> are being handed the op****tunity of their lives to undermine what
remains =
of
> social peace and tranquility in America. =A0When Obama--having drawn
those=
> huge crowds across the Continent--was confronted with the publication of
> some of Reverend Wright's anti-White pronouncements, he sought to
distance=
> himself, not by repudiating the attacks on traditional American
culture--o=
r
> on a political system, he seeks to lead--but by reference to their
> "divisiveness." =A0And he stated, in effect, that Wright was in error
for
> advocating "self-help" without realizing that (according to Obama)
self-he=
lp
> would not be effective unless America could be changed!
>
> "Obama is not more conservative than Reverend Wright. =A0To the
contrary, =
he
> is to his Left. =A0Obama is no friendlier to traditional American
concepts=
, he
> simply denies hating White people. =A0But this does not mean he does not
h=
ate.
> To Obama, it appears that the "more perfect Union," to which he has
> repeatedly adverted, is one where only a single American identity, in a
ne=
w
> egalitarian society, will be acceptable. =A0Obama's "more perfect
Union," =
is
> not one where individual States may dissent from a common unity of
purpose=
,
> nor one where traditional communities may maintain separate identities;
> rather a monolithic coming together, in the name of "change," as defined
b=
y
> Obama.
>
> "The Obama phenomenon is the culmination of an over two generation
attack =
on
> the Union of the Fathers, an increasingly frenetic attack on the ethnic
> identity of Americans of White settler stock, as a unique people; and,
whi=
le
> it may appeal to the doctrinaire Leftist, it is hardly what even the
moder=
n
> 'Liberal' actually sought--or 'signed onto'--at the start of the
process.
> No one, actually elected to Office in the 'New Deal,' would have joined
th=
e
> contem****ary assault on the mere display of the Confederate Battle Flag;
o=
n
> the traditional pride of the American Southerner in his settler and
> Confederate heritage; on anyone's taking pride in his own race or
lineage,=
> and wanting to preserve same. =A0Nor were such assaults yet common in
> mainstream "Liberal" circles, in the days of Kennedy & Johnson.
>
> "There were certainly active efforts to attack practices deemed
unfriendly=
> to minorities. =A0But few mainstream Americans, indeed, equated simple
pri=
de
> in an Anglo-Saxon or Celtic heritage with bigotry; few, indeed, thought
it=
> unacceptable that a small town, with strong Christian roots, would
display=
> the Ten Commandments, or hold a community wide religious observance.
=A0On=
ly a
> small fringe attacked such things. =A0Yet the quality of our politics,
on
> average, has been declining since the 19th Century. =A0While few
attacked
> heritage overtly, few showed a proclivity to defend it against
persistent
> attacks by that small fringe. =A0By the latter days of the Clinton
> Administration, a profound ****ft had taken place in public
perceptions--an=
d,
> as in the era of the Nazi accession in Germany, many things that would
onc=
e
> have seemed unthinkable, became part of an accepted reality.
=A0Intimidate=
d,
> those who knew better remained silent. =A0What is ironic, in the present
O=
bama
> phenomenon, is that the Clintons, who epitomized the promotion and
> acceptance of the new dispensation, would be among its early victims.
=A0I=
n
> the depths of Hell, 'Citizen' Robespierre may be smiling."
>
> The article then goes forward to discuss the possible Communist and Nazi
> contributions to the mass mindset, demonstrated by the chanting Obama
> sup****ters and their leader. =A0For access, use this link:
>
> http://pages.prodigy.net/krtq73aa/chickens.htm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Clintons aren't racist. I remember back in the 90's everyone thought
it was so great to have Bill Clinton as president because he actually
cared about minorities. He wasn't a racist homophobe like Ronold
Raygun or George Bush.
|
