In article
<380b7788-e1b0-4680-ac72-adb09206643b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
MACK DADDY <pepsivanilla@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 15, 10:19 am, "Eddie Haskell" <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "MACK DADDY" <pepsivani...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >
> >
news:f2de64e5-7985-4d40-84e0-1e29feff64d1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On May 14, 9:13 pm, Tim Howard <tim.how...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > So John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama. Big deal. He should have
> > > endorsed someone before Penn. At this point, what does his
endorsement
> > > mean? If I was Obama, I would be thinking "thanks for almost
nothing".
> > > If Edwards had gotten off the pot and endorsed Obama a couple of
weeks
> > > ago, he would have won Indiana and probably would have beaten
Clinton by
> > > 20 points or more in NC. If Edwards' endorsement came before Penn,
he
> > > would have been at least a little closer than 10 points. Why does
> > > Edwards endorse him now that the last blue-collar, all-white state's
> > > contest is over?
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > > It has nothing to do with the race for the Democratic nominee. It
has
> > > to do with Obama endorsing Edwards plan to eliminate poverty.
> >
> > Oh my god not again! Haven't the poor suffered enough destruction of
their
> > families and communities at the hands of democrats so as to create
> > government dependence and votes?
> >
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> The preceding banal drivel brought to you by a Wacko Warmongering
> Republitard.
> YOu got it all wrong. It's the Repulsitards who make poor people
> suffer, except for when they just flat-out kill them. Democrats are
> the party that helps poor people get education, jobs, health care,
> etc. So "wise up, Eddie!"
Eddie is suffering from the Conservative Talking Point/Delusion that
helping poor people actually hurts them. They don't believe it for any
RATIONAL reason. They believe it because they want it to be so, so they
will have an excuse for not wanting to help.
|
