"Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fa4q1i$fd$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <a32xi.487$7f.319@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Mandra <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>"Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:f9usfs$9d0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In article <2evwi.911$Vd.362@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Mandra <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>>"Al Dykes" <adykes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:f9te0v$qtv$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> In article <0%pwi.892$Vd.428@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Mandra <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>Dov Zakheim and the Missing Trillions
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://smokingmirrors.blogspot.com
>>>>>>Monday, August 6
>>>>>>From: Nila Sagadevan <nila22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What is the most outrageous piece of news that isn't being
discussed?
>>>>>>I would venture to say it is the strange tale of Dov Zakheim and
>>>>>>the missing trillions. I hear all kinds of numbers. I hear 2.3
>>>>>>trillion from Rumsfield and I hear about one trillion that Zakheim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The money isn't "missing", they just can't account for how much the
>>>>> spent on which activities. Nobody says the money was stolen.
>>>>
>>>>You gotta be a smartass to say something like that. If they can't
>>>>account
>>>>for 2.3
>>>>trillion dollars what do you think happened to the money, I guess the
>>>>dog
>>>>eat it
>>>>or the computers is hiding it..
>>>>
>>>>from CBS News
>>>>Rumsfeld Sept 10, 2001: The Pentagon cannot account for $2.3 TRILLION
>>>>
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml
>>>>
>>>>CBS video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj1rT4bszWg
>>>>
>>>>On Sept. 10, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on
>>>>foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon
>>>>bureaucracy," he said.
>>>>
>>>
>
>>Here is what the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said as re****ted
by
>>CBS News
>>"According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in
>>transactions,"
>>Rumsfeld admitted.
>>
>>The money went in and then vanished. No record as to what it has been
>>spent
>>on, that means missing.
>>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml
>>
>
>
> Nope. It could have all been spent on exactly what it was meant for.
Then there wouildn't be a problem, you just have to proove it. The things
that you were
supposed to buy, do you have them ? Where are they ? If you can't find
them
then show
me where are the money ? It's that simple, 2.3 Trillion is a loooot of
money.
Worse than Enron, worse than WorldCom: The Pentagon
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2002/09/17/pentagon/index.html
> --
> a d y k e s @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p a n i x . c o m
> Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001
|
