Zelikow is a key player in the zioNist conspiracy.
TY for posting this informative article.
Mandra wrote:
> Video about the head of the 9/11 Commission, Phillip Zelikow
>
> Video from Snowshoe Films--
> http://snowshoefilms.com/
> As Webster Tarpley notes, Zelikow is very im****tant in the 9/11
cover-up. In
> 1998, Philip Zelikow published an article in Foreign Affairs, the
journal of
> the Council on Foreign Relations, entitled "CATASTROPHIC TERRORISM:
> Imagining the Transformative Event." Nearly two years later, PNAC picked
up
> the CFR-Zelikow language, saying that the desired transformation "is
likely
> to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like
a
> new Pearl Harbor..."
>
> In part one of this series, we hear from author Webster Tarpley,
Professor
> Graeme MacQueen (religious studies, McMaster University, ret.), Ken
Jenkins
> (filmmaker), and Peter Dale Scott, author.
>
> Zelikow, hired as a Bush II transition team member for his expertise on
> al-Qaeda (according to Karen Hughes), didn't want to hear anything about
> al-Qaeda from Richard Clarke, chief counter-terrorism expert on George
W.
> Bush's national security council. Similarly, John Ashcroft at the Dept.
of
> Justice didn't want to hear anything about al-Qaeda before 9/11 from
Thomas
> Picard, acting director of the FBI. In these and other instances,
Zelikow as
> executive director of the 9/11 Commission, suborned perjury, Webster
Tarpley
> charges.
>
> Tarpley reveals Zelikow's cover-up role in the Able Danger FBI effort to
> expose "al-Qaeda" cells. Prof. Graeme MacQueen calls attention to
Zelikow's
> unique role in predicting then explicating the consequences of "the
> transformative event" as head of the commission charged with
investigating
> the catastrophic terrorism of 9/11. Ken Jenkins and Peter Dale Scott
note
> that Zelikow's expertise is in creating and exploiting public myths, and
> that Zelikow's links to the neo-cons date to the early 1980s. The 9/11
> investigation was itself an inside job. (more) (less)
>
> Wikipedia helps to clarify this point by adding: "In the Nov-Dec 1998
issue
> of Foreign Affairs he (Zelikow) co-authored (with the former head of the
> CIA) an article entitled 'Catastrophic Terrorism' in which he speculated
> that if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had succeeded, "the
> resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe
it.
> Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in
American
> history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in
> peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did
the
> Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, the event would
divide
> our past and future into a before and after. The United States might
respond
> with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider
> surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly
force."
> ZELIKOW (part one/snowshoefilms series): 10 min. 16 sec.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuoQZkBFj9A
>
> Wikipedia helps to clarify this point by adding: "In the Nov-Dec 1998
issue
> of Foreign Affairs he (Zelikow) co-authored (with the former head of the
> CIA) an article entitled 'Catastrophic Terrorism' in which he speculated
> that if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had succeeded, "the
> resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe
it.
> Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in
American
> history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in
> peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did
the
> Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, the event would
divide
> our past and future into a before and after. The United States might
respond
> with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider
> surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly
force."
>
> According to Wikipedia: "Prof. Zelikow's area of academic expertise is
the
> creation and maintenance of, in his words, 'public myths' or 'public
> presumptions' which he defines as 'beliefs (1) thought to be true
(although
> not necessarily known with certainty) and (2) shared in common within
the
> relevant political community.' In his academic work and elsewhere he has
> taken a special interest in what he has called 'searing' or 'molding'
events
> (that) take on 'transcendent' im****tance and therefore retain their
power
> even as the experiencing generation p***** from the scene. . . . He has
> noted that 'a history's narrative power is typically linked to how
readers
> relate to the actions of individuals in the history; if readers cannot
make
> the connection to their own lives, then a history may fail to engage
them at
> all." ("Thinking about Political History" Miller center Re****t, winter
1999,
> p 5-7)
>
> SOURCE: http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=17359
>
>
|
