1. There is not a shred of EVIDENCE that there is any 9/11 conspiracy.
2. The Holocaust in WWII happened.
Islamists would sup****t both being untrue!
"Mandra" <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:HigBi.575$J65.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Join Libertarians for 911 Truth
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertariansfor911Truth/
>
> In another Yahoo libertarian group, I prepared a set of links for a
> member who asked for information about 9/11 truth, a subject
> with which he was unfamiliar.
>
> I thought I'd share below what I wrote, both because it might be
> helpful to someone here, and also to seek feedback from others
> here who may have better ideas about how to introduce the subject
> online to beginners, especially beginners with libertarian leanings.
>
> (I will mention that the one anti-9/11 truth link here, the Cockburn
> essay about which I posted here recently, is listed right after a
> Griffin essay which eviscerates specifically several of the main
> points
> Cockburn tries to make, so that, if read in that sequence,
> Cockburn's
> enviable rhetorical skill should be to no avail.)
>
>
> I've prepared here what I think is a good group of introductory
> links
> about what's terribly wrong with the official account of what
> happened
> on 9/11. I've done this with what I hope is an eye to someone
> unfamiliar
> with the controversy.
>
> I've divided this into two general categories: written texts, and
> videos.
>
> 1) Texts
>
> The best place to start, I suppose, is with David Ray Griffin, who's
> written
> several outstanding books on the subject. (Not online, I'm afraid.)
>
> Here's an interview with him from a few years ago, not long after
> the
> publication of his first 9/11 book:
>
> http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue6/PerfectCircle_Griffin.cfm
>
> Here's a longish article from about a year ago from the magazine
> Tikkun (he's writing for a leftist audience, but bear in mind that
> his
> discussion of leftist gatekeepers can just as well apply to
> libertarian
> ones):
>
> http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0703/frontpage/empire911
>
> (Before we go further, here's an essay by leftist journalist
> Alexander
> Cockburn, mentioned in the Griffin article just cited, that tries to
> paint 9/11 official story doubters as "nuts," so that you know
> something of what the defenders of the official story tend to say:
>
> ( http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn09092006.html
)
>
> There are profound difficulties at every level of the 9/11 events.
> But
> because these difficulties are so spectacular respecting those
> events
> at the World Trade Center (WTC), it's probably best for a beginner
> to
> the subject to look at them first.
>
> Here a structural engineer discusses the WTC:
>
> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/3
>
> And here a civil engineer does:
>
> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/9
>
> 2) Videos
>
> Here's a full lecture on the whole subject of 9/11 by James Fetzer,
> an
> academic whose specialty is the philosophy of science:
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6404296089696796093&hl=en
>
> Now more things focused on the WTC. First, a video in two parts that
> gives an excellent overview of that:
>
> Part 1 -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqph02WuE9g
> Part 2 -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4dVo5QgYg
>
> Here's a powerful short film about some WTC anomalies:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu9z4TN55CI&mode=related&search=
>
> And here's another:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocZYhWABGj4&mode=related&search=
>
> Here's a full-length do***entary about the WTC collapses, which even
> mentions a couple of witnesses from the last-mentioned short films:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU&mode=related&search=
>
> Finally, here's a two-hour lecture by an architect about the WTC and
> its collapse:
>
> http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025
>
>
>
|
