"Mandra" <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:sEiBi.1662$Pa5.901@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All the evidence is there to see
Where? All I see here is empty space.
Is this your EVIDENCE?
This is it?
>
>
> "Frank Arthur" <Art@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:krhBi.27089$mp6.22270@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Quick. Show us one single shred of EVIDENCE. No hearsay, not
>> innuendo not conspitacy but a solid peice of fact!
>> One!
>>
>> "Mandra" <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:a_gBi.1440$sg5.501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> There is a lot of evidence that suggests a conspiracy behind the
>>> attacks of 9/11 and
>>> Israeli involvement in it.
>>>
>>> "Frank Arthur" <Art@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:5sgBi.39354$t9.15934@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> <Zionist BS snipped >
>>>
>>> "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot
>>> tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified
>>> information."
>>> -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News re****t on the
>>> Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.
>>> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring.html
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mandra" <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:HigBi.575$J65.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Join Libertarians for 911 Truth
>>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertariansfor911Truth/
>>>>>
>>>>> In another Yahoo libertarian group, I prepared a set of links
>>>>> for a
>>>>> member who asked for information about 9/11 truth, a subject
>>>>> with which he was unfamiliar.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought I'd share below what I wrote, both because it might be
>>>>> helpful to someone here, and also to seek feedback from others
>>>>> here who may have better ideas about how to introduce the
>>>>> subject
>>>>> online to beginners, especially beginners with libertarian
>>>>> leanings.
>>>>>
>>>>> (I will mention that the one anti-9/11 truth link here, the
>>>>> Cockburn
>>>>> essay about which I posted here recently, is listed right after
>>>>> a
>>>>> Griffin essay which eviscerates specifically several of the main
>>>>> points
>>>>> Cockburn tries to make, so that, if read in that sequence,
>>>>> Cockburn's
>>>>> enviable rhetorical skill should be to no avail.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've prepared here what I think is a good group of introductory
>>>>> links
>>>>> about what's terribly wrong with the official account of what
>>>>> happened
>>>>> on 9/11. I've done this with what I hope is an eye to someone
>>>>> unfamiliar
>>>>> with the controversy.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've divided this into two general categories: written texts,
>>>>> and videos.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Texts
>>>>>
>>>>> The best place to start, I suppose, is with David Ray Griffin,
>>>>> who's written
>>>>> several outstanding books on the subject. (Not online, I'm
>>>>> afraid.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's an interview with him from a few years ago, not long
>>>>> after the
>>>>> publication of his first 9/11 book:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue6/PerfectCircle_Griffin.cfm
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a longish article from about a year ago from the magazine
>>>>> Tikkun (he's writing for a leftist audience, but bear in mind
>>>>> that his
>>>>> discussion of leftist gatekeepers can just as well apply to
>>>>> libertarian
>>>>> ones):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0703/frontpage/empire911
>>>>>
>>>>> (Before we go further, here's an essay by leftist journalist
>>>>> Alexander
>>>>> Cockburn, mentioned in the Griffin article just cited, that
>>>>> tries to
>>>>> paint 9/11 official story doubters as "nuts," so that you know
>>>>> something of what the defenders of the official story tend to
>>>>> say:
>>>>>
>>>>> ( http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn09092006.html
)
>>>>>
>>>>> There are profound difficulties at every level of the 9/11
>>>>> events. But
>>>>> because these difficulties are so spectacular respecting those
>>>>> events
>>>>> at the World Trade Center (WTC), it's probably best for a
>>>>> beginner to
>>>>> the subject to look at them first.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here a structural engineer discusses the WTC:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/3
>>>>>
>>>>> And here a civil engineer does:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/9
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Videos
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a full lecture on the whole subject of 9/11 by James
>>>>> Fetzer, an
>>>>> academic whose specialty is the philosophy of science:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6404296089696796093&hl=en
>>>>>
>>>>> Now more things focused on the WTC. First, a video in two parts
>>>>> that gives an excellent overview of that:
>>>>>
>>>>> Part 1 -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqph02WuE9g
>>>>> Part 2 -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4dVo5QgYg
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a powerful short film about some WTC anomalies:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu9z4TN55CI&mode=related&search=
>>>>>
>>>>> And here's another:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocZYhWABGj4&mode=related&search=
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a full-length do***entary about the WTC collapses, which
>>>>> even mentions a couple of witnesses from the last-mentioned
>>>>> short films:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU&mode=related&search=
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, here's a two-hour lecture by an architect about the WTC
>>>>> and its collapse:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|
