Because that is all the inside of your skull is made of., y're a nitwit
"Frank Arthur" <Art@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:%qkBi.27217$mp6.6827@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Mandra" <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:sEiBi.1662$Pa5.901@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> All the evidence is there to see
>
> Where? All I see here is empty space.
> Is this your EVIDENCE?
> This is it?
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> "Frank Arthur" <Art@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:krhBi.27089$mp6.22270@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Quick. Show us one single shred of EVIDENCE. No hearsay, not innuendo
>>> not conspitacy but a solid peice of fact!
>>> One!
>>>
>>> "Mandra" <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:a_gBi.1440$sg5.501@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> There is a lot of evidence that suggests a conspiracy behind the
>>>> attacks of 9/11 and
>>>> Israeli involvement in it.
>>>>
>>>> "Frank Arthur" <Art@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:5sgBi.39354$t9.15934@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> <Zionist BS snipped >
>>>>
>>>> "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell
>>>> you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified
>>>> information."
>>>> -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News re****t on the
Israeli
>>>> spy ring and its connections to 9-11.
>>>> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring.html
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Mandra" <Signater@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:HigBi.575$J65.257@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Join Libertarians for 911 Truth
>>>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertariansfor911Truth/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In another Yahoo libertarian group, I prepared a set of links for a
>>>>>> member who asked for information about 9/11 truth, a subject
>>>>>> with which he was unfamiliar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought I'd share below what I wrote, both because it might be
>>>>>> helpful to someone here, and also to seek feedback from others
>>>>>> here who may have better ideas about how to introduce the subject
>>>>>> online to beginners, especially beginners with libertarian
leanings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I will mention that the one anti-9/11 truth link here, the
Cockburn
>>>>>> essay about which I posted here recently, is listed right after a
>>>>>> Griffin essay which eviscerates specifically several of the main
>>>>>> points
>>>>>> Cockburn tries to make, so that, if read in that sequence,
Cockburn's
>>>>>> enviable rhetorical skill should be to no avail.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've prepared here what I think is a good group of introductory
links
>>>>>> about what's terribly wrong with the official account of what
>>>>>> happened
>>>>>> on 9/11. I've done this with what I hope is an eye to someone
>>>>>> unfamiliar
>>>>>> with the controversy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've divided this into two general categories: written texts, and
>>>>>> videos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Texts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The best place to start, I suppose, is with David Ray Griffin,
who's
>>>>>> written
>>>>>> several outstanding books on the subject. (Not online, I'm afraid.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an interview with him from a few years ago, not long after
the
>>>>>> publication of his first 9/11 book:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue6/PerfectCircle_Griffin.cfm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a longish article from about a year ago from the magazine
>>>>>> Tikkun (he's writing for a leftist audience, but bear in mind that
>>>>>> his
>>>>>> discussion of leftist gatekeepers can just as well apply to
>>>>>> libertarian
>>>>>> ones):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0703/frontpage/empire911
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Before we go further, here's an essay by leftist journalist
>>>>>> Alexander
>>>>>> Cockburn, mentioned in the Griffin article just cited, that tries
to
>>>>>> paint 9/11 official story doubters as "nuts," so that you know
>>>>>> something of what the defenders of the official story tend to say:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ( http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn09092006.html
)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are profound difficulties at every level of the 9/11 events.
>>>>>> But
>>>>>> because these difficulties are so spectacular respecting those
events
>>>>>> at the World Trade Center (WTC), it's probably best for a beginner
to
>>>>>> the subject to look at them first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here a structural engineer discusses the WTC:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And here a civil engineer does:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org/info/9
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) Videos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a full lecture on the whole subject of 9/11 by James Fetzer,
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> academic whose specialty is the philosophy of science:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6404296089696796093&hl=en
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now more things focused on the WTC. First, a video in two parts
that
>>>>>> gives an excellent overview of that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Part 1 -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqph02WuE9g
>>>>>> Part 2 -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4dVo5QgYg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a powerful short film about some WTC anomalies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu9z4TN55CI&mode=related&search=
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And here's another:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocZYhWABGj4&mode=related&search=
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a full-length do***entary about the WTC collapses, which
even
>>>>>> mentions a couple of witnesses from the last-mentioned short films:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU&mode=related&search=
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, here's a two-hour lecture by an architect about the WTC
and
>>>>>> its collapse:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|
