After you read this check the links below. The 7/7 London bombings was an
inside Job ordered
by the ZioNazi fascist thugs.
British government faces legal action over refusal to hold inquiry into
London bombings
By Paul Mitchell
3 September 2007
The British government is facing legal action over its continued refusal
to
hold an independent public inquiry into the July 7, 2005 bombings in
London
that killed 56 people and injured 700.
Lawyers for a group of survivors and relatives of the dead have applied
for
a judicial review of the government's decision to ignore their request for
"an independent inquiry, open to public scrutiny to allow for
participation
from the bereaved and survivors." The Brown government has shown itself
even
more determined to rule out an inquiry than the Blair government, despite
new evidence emerging in recent terror trials.
Clifford Tibber of Oury Clark Solicitors said, "We will ask the court to
say
that the home secretary's decision not to order an inquiry is irrational,
and to recognise the rights the relatives and victims have to an inquiry."
Tibber said the government was "accountable" for the deaths and damage
caused by the July 7 bombers, adding, "All the evidence shows that the
government knew or should have known of the existence of at least two of
those bombs; and they have done nothing about it."
This evidence means the statement by former Home Secretary Charles Clarke
that the bombers were "clean skins"-that is, unknown to police and
intelligence agencies-is "untrue" and the parliamentary Intelligence and
Security Committee re****t into the bombings, published last year, was
"imperfect."
In the first terror trial, which ended in April, Omar Khyam, Waheed
Mahmood,
Jawad Akbar, Salahuddin Amin and Anthony Garcia were jailed for life for
conspiring to cause explosions likely to endanger life before their arrest
in March 2004 in the "fertiliser bomb plot" against nightclubs and
shopping
centres.
In July, a jury found Muktar Said Ibrahim, Hussain Osman, Ramzi Mohammed,
and Yassin Omar guilty of conspiracy to murder in a failed attempt to set
off four bombs carried in backpacks in London on July 21, 2005.
In 2003, one of the alleged fertiliser bomb plotters, Mohammed Junaid
Babar,
turned informer after being arrested by the FBI in the United States.
Surveillance of the remaining fertiliser bomb plotters identified the July
7
bombers, Mohammed Sidique Khan and Shezhad Tanweer. Despite being watched
during the 18 months leading up to the attacks, it is claimed MI5 did not
send photographs of Khan and Tanweer to be shown to Babar, who
subsequently
identified Khan as someone he had trained with at an Al Qaeda camp in
Pakistan in 2003.
MI5 officers followed Khan and photographed him on at least four occasions
and made inquiries about a telephone registered in his name. There are
disputed claims that detectives found a monitoring device in Khan's Honda
Accord car. Tanweer was identified on three occasions.
On one occasion, in February 2004, Khan and Tanweer were followed for 15
hours while they were in turn following a car driven by Omar Khyam, the
leader of the fertiliser bombers. On March 23, a week before Khyam's
arrest,
Khan and Tanweer were again filmed and recorded discussing Khan's wish to
fight an "Islamic war" and how to carry out crimes to raise funds. Khan
also
talked about returning to Pakistan-which he did with Tanweer between
November 19, 2004 and February 8, 2005-during which time they may have met
Muktar Said Ibrahim, the alleged leader of the failed July 21 bombings.
According to journalist Ron Suskind, Khan was barred on security grounds
from entering the US in 2004 because of his connections with Al Qaeda
figures. US officials presented MI5 with a detailed file on Khan.
As these revelations show, the lie about "clean skins" is itself enough to
warrant an independent public inquiry. However, there is a long list of
other questions about the July 7 bombings that remain unanswered. These
include claims that warnings were issued by foreign intelligence agencies
about the bombings and that Britain pursued a so-called "covenant of
security" policy with terrorist groups that allowed them to operate as
long
as they did not organise attacks in the country. The deal resulted from
years of Western use of Islamic fundamentalism to counteract secular
nationalist movements in the Middle East and the former Yugoslavia. Of
particular interest is the relation****p of British intelligence to figures
based at Finsbury Park mosque such as cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri and his
associate Haroon Ra****d Aswat, wanted by the US for the alleged
establishment of a terrorist training camp in Oregon.
There has also been no satisfactory explanation for the decision to
downgrade the national security alert in March 2005 despite the pending G8
summit in Scotland, which saw a massive security mobilisation.
Then Prime Minister Tony Blair rejected calls for a public inquiry within
days of the July 7 bombings. At the same time he made use of the bombings
to
claim "the rules of the game" were changing, justify the adoption of a
secret shoot-to-kill policy, which claimed the life of innocent Brazilian
Jean Charles de Menezes, and the mounting of a further offensive on civil
liberties. The government enacted new measures to curtail free speech and
expand the powers of the state to spy on the population, hold alleged
terrorists and their sup****ters for long periods without charges, de****t
immigrants, close down mosques, and cordon off whole areas of cities.
Since then, the Labour government has insisted on a "no inquiry" policy
despite growing evidence that the state knew a lot more about the bombers
than was previously admitted. The constant refrain has been that an
inquiry
will divert police and security service resources from the "war on
terror".
The catalogue of apparent security failures can be attributed to one of
two
causes. Either the actions of the government and security services in the
period leading up to July 7 were politically criminal-talking up a
terrorist
threat and an unending "war on terror" while failing to provide the
necessary resources. Or there is a more sinister possibility-borne out by
the record of MI5 and MI6, and the role provocations have historically
played in Britain's policy in Ireland and elsewhere-that the London
bombings
of July 7 and July 21 were allowed to take place so as to provide the
government with a pretext for further attacks on civil liberties and new
military adventures overseas.
No confidence can be placed in any investigation carried out by the
establishment parties and the British state. The British parliament's
Joint
Committee on Human Rights and the Law Society of England and Wales have
voiced concerns about the 2005 Inquiries Act which sets the terms of
reference for future inquiries. Amnesty International has also asked
British
judges not to take part, saying "any inquiry would be controlled by the
executive which is empowered to block public scrutiny of state actions."
Any such inquiry would serve a similar function as the official inquiries
conducted in the US-to obscure the most vital facts, provide a rationale
for
further attacks on democratic rights at home, and justify militarism and
aggression abroad. A genuinely independent investigation can come about
only
as the product of an independent political movement of the working class
against the ruling elite and its policies of war and social reaction.
End.
--
7/7 Mock Terror Drill: What Relation****p to the Real Time Terror Attacks?
Fictional 7/7 "scenario" of multiple bomb attacks on London's subway
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050808&articleId=821
Interview with an eyewitness to the London bus bomb who states no suscide
bomber on Bus.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mfMnScrqHQ
Daniel Obachike, the author of The 4th Bomb and a survivor of the London
bus
bomb
http://daniel77witness.blogspot.com/
Mind the Gap version 1.0
http://www.officialconfusion.com/77/mindthegap/Google/mindthegap.html
|
