Talk About Network

Google





Government > Equality > Re: Economist n...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 28 Topic 1306 of 1320
Post > Topic >>

Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses

by Mason C <masoncXXX@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 21, 2008 at 02:31 PM

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:07:22 -0800, Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Mason C wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:00:11 -0800, Peter Franks <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>> Mason C wrote:
>>>> That is a failure of the unregulated free market -- overselling and 
>>>> in many cases outright deception if not criminal fraud.
>>> What is an example of the deception and/or fraud?
>>>
>> Deception:  telling people they could afford a house they *obviously* 
>> could *not* afford.   
>
>?
>
>I've always assumed that was MY responsibility.  So is what you are 
>saying that it is someone else's job to tell me what I can and can't 
>afford???

No.  Read.  It is someone -- anyone's -- responsibility to not deceive
you.

>  If that is the case, I've never listened to or obeyed what 
>someone else has told me to do wrt what I can and can't afford.  Please 
>explain why I'm not in debt and live within my means?

You are intelligent and well-educated and not vulnerable to a sharp 
mortgage salesman.  Lucky you.  Not all are so lucky.
>
>> Fraud:  unrecorded verbal instruction at odds with the fine print.
>
>?
>
>What are these "unrecorded verbal instructions" you speak of?

The instructions sharp mortgage salesmen gave to people strongly 
desiring to own a home.   
>
>Doesn't the fine print say that the fine print is the last word on an 
>issue, verbal instructions aren't authorized nor part of the contract? 

Yes.  next question...

>That is what it says on most every one of my contracts...
>
>>> How come I didn't get suckered into the deception and fraud when I 
>>> refinanced several years ago?

You are intelligent and well-educated and not vulnerable to a sharp 
mortgage salesman.  Lucky you.  Not all are so lucky.


>> 
>> I assume from what you say that you were not one of the "many cases."
>> You were smart or lucky.  (I'm surprised by your question.)
>
>Luck had nothing to do with it.  Smart, I don't know.  But I did read 
>the contract and I did take personal responsibility for my actions.

did I miss any question?   if so, I apologize.  please repeat it.




Mason Clark

*Greater America in the Age of Rebellion*
http://frontal-lobe.info/greateramerica.html
 -- many excerpts you can see --
 




 28 Posts in Topic:
Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Mason C <masoncXXX@[EM  2008-11-20 21:44:15 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-20 22:00:11 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Mason C <masoncXXX@[EM  2008-11-20 22:17:40 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-21 10:07:22 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Mason C <masoncXXX@[EM  2008-11-21 14:31:55 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-21 15:36:55 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Mason C <masoncXXX@[EM  2008-11-21 23:37:06 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-22 12:01:41 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Curly Surmudgeon <curl  2008-11-22 13:03:54 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Mason C <masoncXXX@[EM  2008-11-22 14:35:45 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-22 17:26:12 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Knickkklas@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-11-23 07:00:50 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
"Heywood Jablowmi&q  2008-11-22 16:16:16 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
"Squid" <ano  2008-11-21 08:11:46 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
ZerkonXXXX <Z@[EMAIL P  2008-11-21 16:04:29 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
ZerkonXXXX <Z@[EMAIL P  2008-11-21 16:34:53 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-21 10:15:51 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Michael Coburn <mikcob  2008-11-21 18:22:56 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Curly Surmudgeon <curl  2008-11-21 11:03:18 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-21 12:38:43 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Curly Surmudgeon <curl  2008-11-21 16:02:40 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-21 18:26:37 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Knicklas!@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-11-22 07:58:27 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
ZerkonXXXX <Z@[EMAIL P  2008-11-22 13:31:36 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Peter Franks <none@[EM  2008-11-22 12:12:49 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
"V for Vendicar"  2008-11-26 17:40:44 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
Mason C <masoncXXX@[EM  2008-11-26 18:56:32 
Re: Economist nonsense Soc.Sec. and houses
"V for Vendicar"  2008-12-03 19:08:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 21:50:00 PST 2009.