"Michael Coburn" <mikcob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ggn2ci61e7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:14:43 -0800, Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
>> "Mason C" <masoncXXX@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:bksti49nnis6irsd2jl4befrdgsb7clec9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:23:43 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
>>> <crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Mason C" <masoncXXX@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:2gfki4pprbu5uvhq5685sqj8cjs7a3562s@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:20:14 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
>>>>> <crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>FICA is a tax on wages.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh. We didn't know that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff, I have a question: how old are you?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>55. Why?
>>>
>>> I'm sorry to say so but your assumptions about the world seem
juvenile.
>>>
>>> ( I don't like to post such things but I'm getting fed up with the
>>> infantile behavior on the Usenet. I've been kill-filing like crazy
and
>>> it isn't helping. I'll probably abandon ****p.)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Just because I find your view wrong means I'm juvenile?
>>
>> I understand that dropping the collection of FICA tax will put more
cash
>> into the hands of the little people -- me included -- but my point is
>> that FICA is akin to forcing Americans to save money for their
>> retirement. If we give them a bye on saving, then they get less in
>> retirement, and SS is already a pretty crappy retirement account, so
>> stopping the collection of FICA taxes will do more harm than good.
>
> Imagine for one fleeting moment that the money to pay current benefits
> was not being collected from FICA taxes but instead just created and
sent
> out. Your pre-programmed reaction is Martha, hide the children because
> the inflation monster is going to eat them. Money will be worthless
> because we will have hyperinflation.
>
> So now ask yourself what happens if we do half of it? Then 25% of it,
or
> 10% of it. How much inflation do we get?
>
> This _MAY_ help you to understand that the rich people are called rich
> because they have all the money. The objective is to make all that
money
> worth _LESS_ such that honest production is worth _MORE_. The objective
> is to make real investing the only way that the rich people can stay
> rich. The Stock market will no implode because of inflation. The value
> of T-Bills will.
>
> Pleas take the time to understand that moderate to high inflation hurts
> people who _HAVE_ money. It works to the advantage of people who work
> for wages and who OWE money.
But, it is impossible to make the value of money worth less for one group
while making the same money worth more for another group. Money does not
know whos pocket or bank account it sits in. Inflation is bad for
everybody.
That's e-v-e-r-y-b-o-d-y.
It helps to define the inflation you are speaking of as wage inflation or
price inflation. If you are making $22.50 today and go out and buy a new
TV
on your credit card, then get a raise to $27.50, then wage inflation is
good
for you. But if you are paid $22.50 and the $1750 TV you had your eye on
jumps in price to $1950, then price inflation is bad for you.
But, I'm not sure where the discussion became about inflation, we were
talking abouot kickstarting the economy by the curtailment of FICA taxes.
|
