by "John of Aix" <j.murphy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 5, 2008 at 11:04 PM
sizy_one wrote:
> On May 5, 8:24 am, "John of Aix" <j.mur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> sizy_one wrote:
>>> On May 5, 12:11 am, "John of Aix" <j.mur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Blue wrote:
>>>>> Viejo Vizcacha wrote:
>>
>>>>>> It is about time Britain gets out of the European Union. It has
>>>>>> been a US mole and working for the US and against Europe from the
>>>>>> beginning.
>>
>>>>> America may want Britian in Europe but due to the three
>>>>> main parties being pro Europe the British people don't have
>>>>> much choice.
>>
>>>> But there are anti-European parties are there not? However people
>>>> do not vote for them so why not accept that and stop bleating like
>>>> a stuck pig every night?
>>
>>> One day there may be proper unbiased equal political coverage for
>>> all parties that contest elections.
>>
>
> -
>> Why should a very minor and unim****tant party such as the 'BNP'
>> receive as much coverage as the governing or main opposition
>> parties? If you think they should then let's give as much to the
>> Monster Raving Loonies or any other daft grouping that wishes to
>> call itself a political party.
>
> I stand by the fact that all parties should have equal coverage and no
> assumptions should be made as to their value and worth, to do so is to
> prejudge and influence an election.
A ludicrous idea. I set up a party with one member (me), I find the
cash to stand for election and you expect me (or anyone in that
situation) to be given the same amount of air time and publicity as the
major parties? Are you completely daft or is it that you find it
impossible not to reply to posts even when you have nothing to say?
