simple_language@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/thoughts-on-Islam-London-mayor-Boris-Johnson.htm
>
> The Qur'an
>
> "To any non-Muslim reader of the Koran, Islamophobia fear of Islam
> seems a natural reaction, and, indeed, exactly what that text is
> intended to provoke. Judged purely on its scripture to say nothing
> of what is preached in the mosques it is the most viciously
> sectarian of all religions in its heartlessness towards unbelievers.
> As the killer of Theo Van Gogh told his victim's mother this week in a
> Dutch courtroom, he could not care for her, could not sympathise,
> because she was not a Muslim.
When attitudes like that are displayed is it any wonder that people
begin to fear and despise Islam? Yet you don't condemn it, and in your
silence my *reasonable* assumption is you sup****t it.
>
> "The trouble with this disgusting arrogance and condescension is that
> it is widely sup****ted in Koranic texts, and we look in vain for the
> enlightened Islamic teachers and preachers who will begin the process
> of reform. What is going on in these mosques and madrasas? When is
> someone going to get 18th century on Islam's mediaeval
> ass?" (Spectator, 16 July 2005)
Indeed. By their silence the Muslim community en masse joins ranks with
the extremists.
>
>
> 7/7 Bombings
>
> "... it is no use the Muslim Council of Great Britain endlessly saying
> that 'the problem is not Islam', when it is blindingly obvious that in
> far too many mosques you can find sermons of hate, and literature
> glorifying 9/11 and vilifying Jews." (Daily Telegraph, 14 July 2005)
Where is the problem with this. Western Islam is a deceitful and
double-standard faith. If any church were to preach even a quarter of
the hate which has been *recorded* inside mosques there would be outrage
among muslims -huge protests, complete with the usual declarations of
"death to the infidel". Yet muslims seem to expect some kind of
exemption from the standards they demand of others being imposed on
themselves.
Sorry sonny, but we've seen through your game. We know where you're
coming from, what your agenda is, and you are not going to achieve it.
Moreover, by preaching this seperatist, exclusive hatefilled nonsense
you put your entire community at risk of the most appalling backlash,
which is beginning now, despite the best efforts of the left-wing goon
squad to mentally bash us into line.
>
> "The Islamicists last week horribly and irrefutably asserted the
> supreme im****tance of that faith, overriding all worldly
> considerations, and it will take a huge effort of courage and skill to
> win round the many thousands of British Muslims who are in a similar
> state of alienation, and to make them see that their faith must be
> compatible with British values and with loyalty to Britain. That means
> disposing of the first taboo, and accepting that the problem is Islam.
> Islam is the problem." (Spectator, 16 July 2005)
That first taboo is well and truly crumbling into dust, with Labour
politicians openly condemning the multi-cultural agenda. Try another 7/7
and see how popular muslims are then. In your arrogance you forget you
are still a tiny minority, albeit a very shrill and noisome one. British
people dont like disturbance and riot, and we are getting very ****ing
fed up with Islamist hate and double-standards.
>
>
> Religious Hatred Bill
>
> "The proposed ban on incitement to 'religious hatred' makes no sense
> unless it involves a ban on the Koran itself.... Militant Islam has
> been ****elded from proper discussion by cowardice, political
> correctness and a racist assumption that we should privilege the
> beliefs of a minority, even when they appear to be mediaeval." (Daily
> Telegraph, 21 July 2005)
>
>
> The Trouble with Islam
>
> "What makes modern Islam so politically troublesome is that some
> Muslims can be induced to take offence not just at an insult to Islam,
> but at any injustice suffered by one of their co-religionists, and it
> is this deep personal sense of outrage scarcely explicable to our
> post-enlightenment souls that helps the whacko imams to warp the
> alienated young men into becoming suicide bombers...." (Daily
> Telegraph, 21 July 2005)
Hurrah...Yes yes yes!!!
>
>
> Invasion of Afghanistan and the 'Clash of Civilisations'
>
> "Messrs Bush and Blair have a nightmarish diplomatic battle on their
> hands to persuade the Muslims that this is simply a response to
> terror. That task is made infinitely more difficult by the unsayable
> truth, which any student of the Koran will recognise: that this is, to
> some extent, a clash of civilisations. It is a crunching of cultural
> tectonic plates that has been going on, intermittently, since
> Mohammed's followers warred with Charlemagne." (Daily Telegraph, 18
> October 2001)
Hurrah...Yes yes yes!!! Again, more of the same please Mr Johnson. Keep
it up. You alone seem unafraid to speak the truth.
>
>
> Iraq and the 'War on Terror'
>
> "To the paranoid Muslim mind, the evident bogusness of the 'war on
> terror' in so far as it applied to Iraq suggested that the war was
> really about something else: about oil, about humiliating and
> dominating the Islamic world.... To keep talking of war plays on
> militant Muslim paranoia, and, incidentally, since it is a key point
> of Islamic theology that the suicide bomber may not be called a
> martyr, and therefore entitled to his ration of virgins/raisins,
> unless he dies in 'war', we are by our own vocabulary offering these
> people an incitement to murder." ( Spectator, 16 July 2005)
Very astute point. Unfortunately it overlooks the plain fact that the
Isalmists define words as they wish, and many Islamic theologians will
say that any part of the world not accepting of islam and sharia is
dar-al-harb, "the world of war". They have invited this situation. As we
said of Hitler and Germany, "They have sown the wind, let them reap the
whirlwind". So-called moderate muslims by their silence have rendered
themselves meaningless.
>
>
> Foxhunting Ban and Halal Slaughter
>
> "I looked at all those Labour members, gibbering and hooting like a
> bunch of flea-ridden gibbons, taunting Nicholas Soames and other
> Tories brave enough to stick up for an ancient way of life. Would they
> dare to attack halal? Would any of them, in their largely urban seats,
> with their sizeable Muslim minorities, ever have the guts to denounce
> Islamic ritual slaughter? Like hell they would." (Daily Telegraph, 5
> December 2002)
>
Hurrah...Yes yes yes!!!
>
> Multiculturalism and immigration
>
> "As Theodore Dalrymple pointed out in last week's Spectator ... young
> Muslim girls are routinely taken out of school, before the age
> prescribed by law; they are taken off to Pakistan and obliged to marry
> men they have no wish to marry. Does it show a pleasing multicultural
> tolerance, that we allow this to go on?
As W F Deedes has recently
> pointed out, multiculturalism is the wretched consequence of Enoch
> Powell. After his inflammatory 1968 speech, it became almost
> impossible to talk about immigration." ( Daily Telegraph, 1 November
> 2001)
>
Good point.
>
> Multiculturalism and 'Britishness'
>
> "... too many Britons have absolutely no sense of allegiance to this
> country or its institutions. It is a cultural calamity that will take
> decades to reverse, and we must begin now with what I call in this
> morning's Spectator the re-Britannification of Britain. That means
> insisting, in a way that is cheery and polite, on certain values that
> we identify as British. If that means the end of spouting hate in
> mosques, and treating women as second-class citizens, then so be it.
> We need to acculturate the second-generation Muslim communities to our
> way of life." (Daily Telegraph, 14 July 2005)
>
> "We've all got to be as British as Carry On films and scotch eggs and
> falling over on the beach while trying to change into your swimming
> trunks with a towel on. We should all feel the same mysterious pang at
> the sight of the Queen. We do indeed need to inculcate this
> Britishness, especially into young Muslims.... We should teach British
> history. We should think again about the jilbab, with the signals of
> apartness that it sends out, and we should probably scrap faith
> schools. We should forbid the imams from preaching sermons in anything
> but English; because if you want to build a society where everyone
> feels included, and where everyone shares in the national story, we
> cannot continue with the multicultural apartheid." (Daily Telegraph, 4
> August 2005)
>
> "... here is how John Reid could prove that he was really tough. Here
> is the bravest thing he could possibly say. He should say that the
> real problem in our society, and the reason we have so many
> disaffected and alienated Muslim youths, is that for a generation he
> and people like him sup****ted the disastrous multicultural agenda. The
> reason that 40 per cent of British Muslims would like some form of
> Sharia law in this country is that the Left has traditionally
> deprecated British institutions and even the teaching of English. A
> truly brave John Reid would now publicly grovel to Ray Honeyford, the
> Bradford head who called for teaching in English and who was vilified
> and persecuted by the Left." (Daily Telegraph, 16 November 2006)
>
> [Note: In a notorious article published in the Salisbury Review in
> 1984 Honeyford claimed to expose "the real educational consequences of
> the general acceptance of the notion that multi-racial inner cities
> are not only inevitable but, in some sense, desirable". Re****ting on a
> meeting with Bradford Asian parents at his school, he wrote: "The
> hysterical political temperament of the Indian sub-continent became
> evident an extraordinary sight in an English School Hall." Honeyford
> denounced as "totalitarian" the proposals that "schoolbooks with a
> racist content should be scrapped" and that "racist teachers should be
> dismissed". This is the man Johnson hails as a hero.]
And life in the inner city is Soooooo pleasant. Must be why anyone with
any money leaves as soon as they can. I mean it feels so "British" in
Bradford, or the East End of London.....wake up muslims, by your
isolation you risk being cut off.
>
>
> Faith schools
>
> "... he worries about schools that, without proper regulation, might
> encourage divisions between communities. He does not mean Jewish ones.
> 'It's pretty obvious what I'm talking about,' he says, rather gruffly.
> Indeed it is. 'I do worry there are some communities, where faith
> schools that aren't properly regulated and controlled could be places
> that encourage more division...'." (Jewish Chronicle, 7 September
> 2007)
>
Those would be the Islamic schools where they taught from Saudi school
books calling Jews apes and pigs, telling them that all good Muslims
will one day kill all the Jews and force the Christians to become
muslim. Sure you'll find a lot of that in Jewish schools.
The problem, which you know full well but deliberately deny, is not in
the fact that you want a school of an Islamic nature, but the content
you teach within those schools. Since it seems that muslims are
exploiting the faith school exemption to introduce a warped extremist
ideology based madrassa experience for young minds, all faiths must
suffer the loss of the privelege to be educated in an atmosphere based
on their beliefs.
Once again, because Islam can't or wont respect the "Golden Rule" -that
one treats ones neighbour as one would like to be treated - [and that
doesnt mean you'd like sharia so everyone must like sharia, but you like
sharia, and I like halacha so you do your thing, I do mine in mutual
respect]- the whole community suffers.
Is it just me, or is there something about these Muslims, that wherever
there are muslims, there's trouble.
>
> Shabina Begum
>
> "This ludicrous and lamentable case had nothing to do with 'modesty'.
> I don't believe she wore the jilbab to 'regain control of her
> body'.... This case wasn't even about religion, or conscience, or the
> dictates of faith. At least it wasn't primarily about those things. It
> was about power. It was about who really runs the schools in this
> country, and about how far militant Islam could go in bullying the
> poor, cowed, gelatinous and mentally spongiform apparatus of the
> British state.
Exactly. Once again militant Islam tried to chisel out an advantage for
itself from the foundations of our society. Thankfully they were
defeated and many people awoke to how absurd and dangerous they are. But
as the man said in Aliens after beating off one attack, "They'll be back"
>
> "
the Court of Appeal was quite wrong in its *****sment of Shabina's
> human rights. Yes, she has the right to freedom of religion, but she
> could not manifest that freedom in such a way as to prejudice the
> school's ability to ensure discipline and order, and to run things in
> the way it wanted. Even in Strasbourg, home of the European Court of
> Human Rights, there is a long-standing tradition of upholding the
> discretion of educational establishments in matters of dress not least
> in several im****tant cases defending the right of Turkish universities
> to ban headscarves.
>
> "How could the Court of Appeal have missed this? Is it really possible
> that British appeal court judges have less robust common sense than
> the judges of Strasbourg? Or is it also that our judges suffer, like
> other parts of the British Establishment, from a certain leeriness and
> timorousness about Islam?" (Daily Telegraph, 23 March 2006)
Good point Boris.
>
>
> Ken and Qaradawi
>
> "I can think of plenty of things for which I would like Newtzilla to
> apologise ... his cheerleading for anti-Semitic Muslim clerics such as
> al-Qaradawi, who sup****ts suicide bombers and the beating of
> women." (Daily Telegraph, 17 February 2005)
>
Thanfully Red Ken got his P45 and is out of a job. Londoners became sick
of his racists and divisive politics, and kicked him out, regardless of
the Muslim "block vote" he courted by shaking hands with the sheikh. DO
you think he has noticed the blood yet?
>
> Local Control of the NHS
>
> "... you could imagine in a totally devolved system that Islamic
> zealots might take control of some inner-city area". (Daily Telegraph,
> 5 October 2006)
Roll on the backlash if that should ever happen. Muslims seem to have
forgotten its their duty to assimilate with me, not me with them. If
they dont like it, **** off to Saudi Arabia, just as I would be expected
to if I demanded even 10% of the things Islam has demanded here inside
the magic kingdom.
>
>
> Israel and the War on Lebanon
>
> "Israel provides a focus for the resentment of a Muslim civilisation
> that finds itself materially and intellectually humiliated by the
> achievements of America and the West.... Whatever the hideous shambles
> of the past few days, it is still true, in principle, that when
> Israeli rockets kill civilians, they have missed their targets, and
> that when Hizbollah rockets kill civilians, they have scored a
> deliberate hit." (Daily Telegraph, 3 August 2006)
Israel is the frontline of Western civilisation. They are
* the only democracy in the Middle East
* an advanced secular nation with
* equal rights for men and women
They have been fighting against people who disguise a wish to continue
the Hitlerian genocide in a pathetic dishonest lie about land. Arafat
was offered 98% of his demands and rejected them, prefering jihad.
After all, if you were a corrupt, thieving politician who'd never done
a thing for your people apart from making speeches, wouldn't you prefer
a jihad....what would all those Arab and Iranian politicians do if they
couldnt blame all their failings on the "international Zionist
conspiracy" or "imperialist America and Britain".
Islam is at a crossroads. Its wake up or die time. You will never
overcome in the West, the resistance to your agenda is well established.
Everything you preach goes totally against hundreds of years of our
traditions and culture, and the more you scream and demand, the more
people awaken to how loathsome your agenda is. Learn to live *within* a
community, silence these insane fools who speak of one day taking over
the West, or suffer what will be very real consequnces as ordinary
people turn against the muslim community as a whole. Just look at the
BNP. Once a minority of a minority, loathed and scorned by 99.99% of the
population, [without any encouragement from lefty multiculturalists, but
because it offended British "fair-play" values], now growing sup****t
everyday everywhere. This is directly the result of the growth of
militant Islam in Britain.
You wanted simple language? Well there's a whole dose of simply put.
I'm done with Islam, I reject it utterly. It is a hate-filled creed that
has no place in the West. By all means practice your faith in private,
but the agenda adopted by seeminly the majority of the muslim community
goes - or you do.
|
