Why does nobody mention that both Obama and HC came away from New Hamp****re
with nine
(9) votes each? Statistically, they tied.
Another thing I read which makes sense: Perhaps the winning margin for
her, small as
it was, which occurred in opposition to the polls was due to absentee
ballots which
are not counted until the voting is over....AAC
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:09:21 -0500, "Patriot Games" <Patriot@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Novak:_Hillary_Will_Get_N/2008/01/10/63301.html
>
>Novak: Hillary Will Get Nasty
>
>Thursday, January 10, 2008
>
>Hillary Clinton's surprising win in the New Hamp****re primary strengthens
>the case for John McCain as the Republican best prepared to deal with a
>Clinton campaign that is sure to get "nastier," according to columnist
>Robert Novak.
>
>About McCain, Novak writes: "The man who spent six years in a communist
>prison and has been abused and reviled by Wa****ngton's K Street power
>brokers may be the only Republican who can cope with what the Clintons
would
>throw at him.
>
>"McCain, though he is far from beloved in his own party's ranks, is
perhaps
>better equipped to withstand the battering he would receive from the
>Clintons and be able to respond in kind."
>
>The lesson of New Hamp****re for Barack Obama, Novak observes, is that his
>"rock-star popularity" won't suffice in a battle with the Clintons, who
>"have given no quarter to their political foes."
>
>Novak concludes: "When it seemed that Obama would win in New Hamp****re,
the
>Clinton camp was preparing an attack strategy against him. Since Obama is
>favored in the next big primary in South Carolina on Jan. 26, he can
expect
>more of the same ahead."
|
