Re: Hitlary Vows to Surrender to Al Qaeda In Iraq in 60 Days!

> The CONGRESS whether Democrat, Republican or Smurf needs to reduce the
> power of the EXECUTIVE.  Party politics do not enter into this
> consideration.
>
> Additionally, they've been in power for just a year and are involved
> in an election year in which they are quite likely to take more seats
> in Congress and the White House.  They're doing exactly what I
> predicted they would do a year ago.  They're treading water,
> clarifying their positions and feeding rope to the GOP.  When the Dems
> have Congress *and* the White House, they'll probably become more
> active at reversing some of the damage done by this administration.
> And I shall enjoy watching Republican partisans whine and cry like the
> little babies they are for at least the next four years.

Finally! someone who has it right! The first year will be tough, The next 
year will need to bring to light all the "sweetheart deals" indentify and 
disban them that the GOP enacted. While working on laws and bills to
remove 
the favors given to the "rich and needy" "W's. Base" and implementing laws

and such that will bring this country back. Having too many rich people,
is 
like having too many poor people neither wants to spend money they want to

hang on to it.

>
> The difference will be largely one of information.  What will ****bama
> the President find out about world affairs that ****bama the candidate
> doesn't know and how will that affect the policy intentions of the
> candidate once elected.
>
> Swill

They are all being updated as their campaigns progress, question is who
will 
be more effective in solving them? Obama has no past dealings with middle 
east leaders, old man Clinton has and you know he HAS to tag along to
them, 
BUT who would be her VP? WHO would be Edwards VP? or Obama's? Sectary
State, 
Sec Defense, Health, Education, etc who would answer those calls and make
a 
difference?

MB