"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:pscop3lg1978t2dscv00kdth43ojug9o7f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "M.Butzin" <mfbutzin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> used a stick in the sand to babble
>
>>> Additionally, they've been in power for just a year and are involved
>>> in an election year in which they are quite likely to take more seats
>>> in Congress and the White House. They're doing exactly what I
>>> predicted they would do a year ago. They're treading water,
>>> clarifying their positions and feeding rope to the GOP. When the Dems
>>> have Congress *and* the White House, they'll probably become more
>>> active at reversing some of the damage done by this administration.
>>> And I shall enjoy watching Republican partisans whine and cry like the
>>> little babies they are for at least the next four years.
>>
>>Finally! someone who has it right! The first year will be tough, The
next
>>year will need to bring to light all the "sweetheart deals" indentify
and
>>disban them that the GOP enacted. While working on laws and bills to
>>remove
>>the favors given to the "rich and needy" "W's. Base" and implementing
laws
>>and such that will bring this country back. Having too many rich people,
>>is
>>like having too many poor people neither wants to spend money they want
to
>>hang on to it.
>
> We wish these things to be so but they are not likely to pass. Even
> if the Dems solidify their control of Congress and take the White
> House, they are unlkely to undo much of what Bush has done. They're
> going to be much too busy trying to keep the economy from imploding
> and Iraq from exploding to, for example, stand up to Big Pharma and
> modify or repeal Part D. It would be nice if the Dems could undo some
> of that damage such as consumer credit legislation and dozens of other
> GOP screw ups but I'm not counting on it and will be satisfied if they
> can stave off a serious and long recession and get us disentangled
> from Iraq and other conflicts with minimal damage and after effects.
>
>>> The difference will be largely one of information. What will ****bama
>>> the President find out about world affairs that ****bama the candidate
>>> doesn't know and how will that affect the policy intentions of the
>>> candidate once elected.
>
>>They are all being updated as their campaigns progress, question is who
>>will
>>be more effective in solving them? Obama has no past dealings with
middle
>>east leaders, old man Clinton has and you know he HAS to tag along to
>>them,
>>BUT who would be her VP? WHO would be Edwards VP? or Obama's? Sectary
>>State,
>>Sec Defense, Health, Education, etc who would answer those calls and
make
>>a
>>difference?
>
> There are many things, particularly with regard to foreign policy that
> the Candidate will never know. Will only find out about when he/she
> actually sits in the Oval Office.
>
> Swill
With Hailboouty robbing the treasury it take a while to stop that as well,
the blank checks that are out there still have to come in.
MB
|
